2016
DOI: 10.1112/jlms/jdw005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditionally negative type functions on groups acting on regular trees

Abstract: Let T q+1 = (V, E) be the (q+1)-regular tree and let G be a group of automorphisms acting transitively on the vertices and on the boundary of T q+1 . We give an upper bound for the growth of cocycles with values in any unitary representation of the group G. This bound is optimal by projecting the Haagerup cocycle onto an appropriate subspace of ℓ 2 (E). We also obtain a description of functions conditionally of negative type which are unbounded.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an independent work, Gournay and Jolissaint obtained a formula for the norm of harmonic cocycles [10,Theorem 1.2] which subsume our estimate. Indeed, since the average of B(x, y) over the neighbors y of x is proportional to the indicator function on ∂X, the cocycle B : X 2 → C(∂X)/C is harmonic (1) , i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an independent work, Gournay and Jolissaint obtained a formula for the norm of harmonic cocycles [10,Theorem 1.2] which subsume our estimate. Indeed, since the average of B(x, y) over the neighbors y of x is proportional to the indicator function on ∂X, the cocycle B : X 2 → C(∂X)/C is harmonic (1) , i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Therefore P B yields an harmonic 1-cocycle of Aut(X) for its regular representation into ℓ 2 (E). Viewing it as an inhomogeneous 1-cocycle, their result implies Theorem 3 (Gournay-Jolissaint [10,Theorem 1.2]). For every integer q ≥ 2, there are constants C ′ , K ′ > 0 such that P B(x, y) 2 = C ′ d(x, y) − K ′ (1 − q −d(x,y) ), for all x, y ∈ X.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…There are clearly cases outside those described in the previous subsection where virtual coboundaries are useful. In this subsection, the setting is that of [29]; as such the groups may not be finitely generated. These are groups acting on trees by automorphism.…”
Section: Virtual Coboundary For Groups Acting On Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in this context, there are no constant functions in W ! Let us now describe a virtual coboundary for the Haagerup cocycle (see [29] for further background and see [20, §3] for another possible choice). A simple computations shows that f may be defined as follows:…”
Section: Virtual Coboundary For Groups Acting On Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our other application concerns direct product. Given two graph H 1 = (X 1 , E 1 ) and Proposition 1 and Corollary 3 also have consequences on the cohomology of Hilbertian representations with ℓ p -coefficients, see [7,Corollary 2.6]. The same can be said for some representations given by G L q (with coefficients in ℓ p ) modulo the following remark:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%