2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional VaR estimation using Pearson’s type IV distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhu and Galbraith (2011) use a generalised asymmetric Student's in conjunction with a nonlinear GARCH model to predict expected shortfall on the returns of six stocks and the S&P 500. Bhattacharyya et al (2008) use a Pearson type IV distribution, which is a further generalisation of the GB2, in conjunction with a GARCH model for estimation of CVaR using 14 national equity indices. Although they find their results superior to using a normal-GARCH combination, the Pearson type IV failed some goodness of fit tests.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhu and Galbraith (2011) use a generalised asymmetric Student's in conjunction with a nonlinear GARCH model to predict expected shortfall on the returns of six stocks and the S&P 500. Bhattacharyya et al (2008) use a Pearson type IV distribution, which is a further generalisation of the GB2, in conjunction with a GARCH model for estimation of CVaR using 14 national equity indices. Although they find their results superior to using a normal-GARCH combination, the Pearson type IV failed some goodness of fit tests.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that accurate computation of both CVaR and Rachev ratios depend in turn on accurate computation of value at risk itself. The effect of departures from a normal distribution on commonly used risk measures, such as value at risk or conditional value at risk (also called expected shortfall) have been considered by several operational researchers including Stoyanov et al (2013), Goh et al (2012), Natarajan et al (2008) and Bhattacharyya et al (2008). In addition there is a large finance literature covering these two risk measures.…”
Section: Portfolio Risk Management Under Generalised Multivariate Stumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, and ε t satisfies the condition in (8). Then, if there exists a c = 1 such that ε * t satisfies the condition in (8) (i.e., u(c) = 1 for some positive c = 1), the PQMLE can not be identified under (8). Thus, we need Assumption 4 to rule out this un-desirable situation.…”
Section: •2 the Pearson's Type IV Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last system of equations has been applied in financial time series by Bhattacharyya, Chaudhary, and Yadav (2008), Brännäs and Nordman (2003), and Premaratne and Bera (2005). Since the variable domain of the Pearson type-IV distribution is (−∞, + ∞), Chen and Nie (2008) proposed a lognormal sum approximation using a variant of the Pearson distribution to account for the (0, + ∞) domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%