2018
DOI: 10.1289/ehp2998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional Toxicity Value (CTV) Predictor: An In Silico Approach for Generating Quantitative Risk Estimates for Chemicals

Abstract: Background:Human health assessments synthesize human, animal, and mechanistic data to produce toxicity values that are key inputs to risk-based decision making. Traditional assessments are data-, time-, and resource-intensive, and they cannot be developed for most environmental chemicals owing to a lack of appropriate data.Objectives:As recommended by the National Research Council, we propose a solution for predicting toxicity values for data-poor chemicals through development of quantitative structure–activit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
84
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(51 reference statements)
3
84
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The cumulative noncarcinogenic risk for multiple pollutants was calculated as , where stands for the number of assessed pollutants. The values were either retrieved from various databases/documents (Excel Table S8) or estimated by the CTV software ( http://toxvalue.org ; Wignall et al. 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The cumulative noncarcinogenic risk for multiple pollutants was calculated as , where stands for the number of assessed pollutants. The values were either retrieved from various databases/documents (Excel Table S8) or estimated by the CTV software ( http://toxvalue.org ; Wignall et al. 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QSAR models in the CTV software ( http://toxvalue.org ; Wignall et al. 2018 ) were also adopted to predict the values ( ) for pollutants with unavailable NOAEL and LOAEL data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations