2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional Recurrence-Free Survival after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Persistent Deleterious Association with RAS and TP53 Co-Mutation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The graph of estimated hazard function of recurrence of CLM suggests that most of the recurrence occurs within 2 years after initial hepatectomy, and disease‐free interval elapsed from the initial hepatectomy predicts increased probability of survival (Figure 3B). Similar outcomes were also reported in several studies 17,18 . These observations support the rationale for handling CLM as a localized disease in selected cases.…”
Section: Basic Oncological Behavior Of Colorectal Liver Metastasessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The graph of estimated hazard function of recurrence of CLM suggests that most of the recurrence occurs within 2 years after initial hepatectomy, and disease‐free interval elapsed from the initial hepatectomy predicts increased probability of survival (Figure 3B). Similar outcomes were also reported in several studies 17,18 . These observations support the rationale for handling CLM as a localized disease in selected cases.…”
Section: Basic Oncological Behavior Of Colorectal Liver Metastasessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although likely influenced by the inclusion of several agents targeting EGFR in the drug testing panel, this separation was also reflected on the genomic and transcriptomic levels, specifically by the well-known markers RAS mutation and TP53 activity. Notably, the "double-resistant" subgroup with RAS and TP53 comutations has known poor prognostic associations after hepatic resection (45,46), reinforcing the challenge of adequate management of these patients. Based on pre-defined, although not yet clinically validated drug nomination criteria, we could suggest potentially effective therapies for eighteen of the totally twenty-two patients, including seven of the nine patients with RAS and TP53 co-mutations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, our group reported that the probability of recurrence peaked at approximately 1 year and diminished thereafter . 30 Additionally, the risk of recurrence changes over time by the interval free from recurrence after surgery (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Surveillance After Resection Of Clmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Comutation of RAS and TP53 was associated with worse OS than RAS alteration alone, and median RFS was lower for patients with RAS/TP53 co-mutation than for those with RAS/TP53 wild-type, even among patients who were free of recurrence at 1 year (1.5 years vs. 2.8 years; p = 0.006) or who were free of recurrence at 2 years (3.0 years vs. 5.9 years; p = 0.024) . 30 Somatic gene alterations in RAS (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.20-1.82; p < 0.001), TP53 (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.11-1.78; p = 0.005), and SMAD4 (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.20-2.20; p = 0.002) were associated with worse OS after CLM resection, and alterations in more than one of these three genes were associated with worse OS and RFS than alteration in only one or none of Fig. 6 Four cancer-related signaling pathways associated with prognosis after CLM resection them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%