2021
DOI: 10.5194/se-12-1197-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional probability of distributed surface rupturing during normal-faulting earthquakes

Abstract: Abstract. Coseismic surface faulting is a significant source of hazard for critical plants and distributive infrastructure; it may occur either on the principal fault or as distributed rupture on nearby faults. Hazard assessment for distributed faulting is based on empirical relations which, in the case of normal faults, were derived almost 15 years ago using a dataset of US earthquakes. We collected additional case histories worldwide, for a total of 21 earthquakes, and calculated the conditional probability … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Edgecumbe earthquake is a moderate magnitude earthquake with short primary fault rupture length (i.e., the Edgecumbe fault) compared to average and maximum slip, a high degree of secondary faulting, and wide faulted zone compared to global catalogs of normal fault earthquakes. For example, normal fault earthquakes have an average‐to‐maximum surface slip ratio of 0.35 ± 0.11 m, and only 30% of events show distributed faulting at 7 km from the primary fault (Ferrario & Livio, 2021; Wesnousky, 2008); our results show a ratio of 0.48 and distributed faulting at distances up to ∼8 km from the Edgecumbe fault. Fault displacement hazard curves ultimately hinge on data from past events, so improving rupture mapping accuracy directly impacts hazard estimates derived from global catalogs (e.g., Ferrario & Livio, 2018, 2021).…”
Section: Pushing the Limits: Lessons Learned In Reconstructing Modera...mentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Edgecumbe earthquake is a moderate magnitude earthquake with short primary fault rupture length (i.e., the Edgecumbe fault) compared to average and maximum slip, a high degree of secondary faulting, and wide faulted zone compared to global catalogs of normal fault earthquakes. For example, normal fault earthquakes have an average‐to‐maximum surface slip ratio of 0.35 ± 0.11 m, and only 30% of events show distributed faulting at 7 km from the primary fault (Ferrario & Livio, 2021; Wesnousky, 2008); our results show a ratio of 0.48 and distributed faulting at distances up to ∼8 km from the Edgecumbe fault. Fault displacement hazard curves ultimately hinge on data from past events, so improving rupture mapping accuracy directly impacts hazard estimates derived from global catalogs (e.g., Ferrario & Livio, 2018, 2021).…”
Section: Pushing the Limits: Lessons Learned In Reconstructing Modera...mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…For example, normal fault earthquakes have an average‐to‐maximum surface slip ratio of 0.35 ± 0.11 m, and only 30% of events show distributed faulting at 7 km from the primary fault (Ferrario & Livio, 2021; Wesnousky, 2008); our results show a ratio of 0.48 and distributed faulting at distances up to ∼8 km from the Edgecumbe fault. Fault displacement hazard curves ultimately hinge on data from past events, so improving rupture mapping accuracy directly impacts hazard estimates derived from global catalogs (e.g., Ferrario & Livio, 2018, 2021). Based on our mapping and Rotoitipakau fault traces from Beanland et al.…”
Section: Pushing the Limits: Lessons Learned In Reconstructing Modera...mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The Edgecumbe earthquake is a moderate magnitude (Mw 6.5) earthquake that has a short primary fault rupture length (i.e., the Edgecumbe fault) compared to average and maximum slip, high degree of secondary faulting, and a very wide faulted zone compared to global catalogs of normal fault earthquakes (Ferrario & Livio, 2021;Wesnousky, 2008). Our additional fault trace mapping only increases these values-secondary faulting is denser than previously recognized, increasing the amount of distributed faulting for this event (Ferrario & Livio, 2021). Based on our mapping combined with the Rotoitipakau fault traces from Beanland et al (1989), there were 17.6 km of primary fault (Edgecumbe and Awaiti) surface rupture traces and 36.8 km of secondary fault surface rupture traces (Fig.…”
Section: Role Of Minor Faults During Coseismic Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Case Study of Multidisciplinary Surface Faulting Assessment in the Urbanized Fucino Basin, Italy INTRODUCTION Fault displacement hazard (FDH) is the hazard due to the occurrence of coseismic ruptures of the ground surface located along fault traces rupturing during medium-to-large earthquakes (e.g., Youngs et al, 2003;Moss & Ross, 2011;Petersen et al, 2011;Baize et al, 2020;Nurminen et al, 2020;Ferrario & Livio, 2021;IAEA, 2015;. The FDH is therefore strictly connected to the presence of the so-called capable faults, that is faults that have accommodated at least one surface-rupturing earthquake in recent times and have the potential for releasing surface-rupturing earthquakes in the future (IAEA, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%