2019
DOI: 10.3390/sym11081004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional Granger Causality and Genetic Algorithms in VAR Model Selection

Abstract: Overcoming symmetry in combinatorial evolutionary algorithms is a challenge for existing niching methods. This research presents a genetic algorithm designed for the shrinkage of the coefficient matrix in vector autoregression (VAR) models, constructed on two pillars: conditional Granger causality and Lasso regression. Departing from a recent information theory proof that Granger causality and transfer entropy are equivalent, we propose a heuristic method for the identification of true structural dependencies … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous research studies have sought to minimize estimation bias when applying Granger causality analysis. One of the proposed solutions involves utilizing a combination of lasso regression and genetic algorithm, facilitated by initialization, selection, feature cross over, and mutation, to overcome coefficient overfitting [15]. Similarly, a new unified Granger causality method has been proposed, addressing the inconsistency between model order selection criteria and hypothesis testing procedures [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous research studies have sought to minimize estimation bias when applying Granger causality analysis. One of the proposed solutions involves utilizing a combination of lasso regression and genetic algorithm, facilitated by initialization, selection, feature cross over, and mutation, to overcome coefficient overfitting [15]. Similarly, a new unified Granger causality method has been proposed, addressing the inconsistency between model order selection criteria and hypothesis testing procedures [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%