2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3235206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditional Cooperation and the Effect of Punishment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2015 , 2016 ). Similar results have been obtained in the context of n -player games (de Melo and Piaggi 2015 ; Kirchkamp and Mill 2018 ; Rand et al . 2009 ; Sefton et al .…”
Section: The Evolution Of Punishmentsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 2015 , 2016 ). Similar results have been obtained in the context of n -player games (de Melo and Piaggi 2015 ; Kirchkamp and Mill 2018 ; Rand et al . 2009 ; Sefton et al .…”
Section: The Evolution Of Punishmentsupporting
confidence: 86%
“… 2014 ; Shinada and Yamagishi 2007 ; Yamagishi 1986 ). In a recent experimental study, the number of free-riders increased under the threat of punishment, relative to a condition where no punishment was possible (Kirchkamp and Mill 2018 ). By way of explanation for this counter-intuitive result, the authors posit either a possible crowding out effect (where any intrinsic motivation to cooperate might be extinguished by the extrinsic threat of punishment) or the possibility that people expected to be punished and thus attempted to minimise payoff losses ex ante by defecting.…”
Section: The Evolution Of Punishmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation