Condition‐specific competition allows coexistence of competitively superior exotic oysters with native oysters

Abstract

Summary 1.Trade-offs between competitive ability and tolerance of abiotic stress are widespread in the literature. Thus, condition-specific competition may explain spatial variability in the success of some biological invaders and why, in environments where there is small-scale environmental variability, competitively inferior and superior species can coexist. 2. We tested the hypothesis that differences in abiotic stress alter the outcome of competitive interactions between the native Sydney rock oysters Saccostrea glomerata and exotic Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas by experimentally testing patterns of intra-and interspecific competition across a tidal elevation gradient of abiotic stress at three sites on the east coast of Australia. 3. At low and mid-intertidal heights, exotic C. gigas were able to rapidly overgrow and smother native S. glomerata , which grew at c . 60% of the exotic's rate. In high intertidal areas, where C. gigas displayed about 80% mortality but similar growth rates to S. glomerata , the native oyster was not affected by the presence of the exotic species. 4. Asymmetrical effects of the exotic species on the native could not be replicated by manipulating densities of conspecifics, confirming that effects at low and mid-intertidal heights were due to interspecific competition. 5. Our results suggest that the more rapid growth of C. gigas than S. glomerata comes at the cost of higher mortality under conditions of abiotic stress. Thus, although C. gigas may rapidly overgrow S. glomerata at low and mid tidal heights, the native oyster will not be competitively excluded by the exotic due to release from competition at high intertidal elevations. 6. The success of trade-offs in explaining spatial variation in the outcome of competitive interactions between C. gigas and S. glomerata strengthen the claim that these may be a useful tool in the quest to produce general predictive models of invasion success.

Short-term effects of CO2, nutrients and temperature on three marine macroalgae under solar radiation

“…All data were normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), variances were homogeneous (Levene's test) and mean values were generally considered as significantly dif-ferent at p < 0.05. Where the Levene's test indicated heterogeneity of variances, even after transformation (this was the case for some pigment data), a more conservative α of 0.01 was applied to minimise the probability of a Type I error (Krassoi et al 2008). The least significant difference (LSD) test was applied to differentiate between means when significance was found.…”

The art of choice: predation risk changes interspecific competition between freshwater amphipods

“…However, the result of interspecific competition may depend on a number of environmental factors, both abiotic, such as salinity (Wijnhoven et al 2002), water movements (Genin et al 1994;Krassoi et al 2008;, temperature (Taniguchi and Nakano 2000), or substratum (Palmer and Ricciardi 2004), and biotic, such as parasites (Hatcher et al 2006). Thorough examination of relationships between species across a wide range of environmental conditions may allow better prediction of the outcome of their competition in the field.…”

Pesticide has asymmetric effects on two tadpole species across density gradient

“…Competition is one of the major biotic factors affecting species' distribution and abundance [1,2] and is known to regulate community composition [3,4]. The effects of competition can be altered by abiotic factors in natural communities [5].…”