The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.7146/math.scand.a-15190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condition number and eccentricity of a closed convex cone

Abstract: We discuss some extremality issues concerning the circumradius, the inradius, and the condition number of a closed convex cone in R n . The condition number refers to the ratio between the circumradius and the inradius. We also study the eccentricity of a closed convex cone, which is a coefficient that measures to which extent the circumcenter differs from the incenter.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-eccentricity is a geometric property Table 1 Largest observed value (second row) and expected value (third row) of θ(K) n = 3 n = 4 n = 5 n = 10 n = 15 n = 20 0.1988 π 0.2239 π 0.2409 π 0.2479 π 0.2492 π 0.2497 π 0.0528 π 0.0720 π 0.0829 π 0.1025 π 0.1089 π 0.1127 π studied in depth in the references Henrion and Seeger (2011) and Seeger and Torki (2013). The following proposition is a nontrivial result borrowed from (Seeger and Torki 2013, Theorem 2.2).…”
Section: Volumetric Center Versus Incentermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Non-eccentricity is a geometric property Table 1 Largest observed value (second row) and expected value (third row) of θ(K) n = 3 n = 4 n = 5 n = 10 n = 15 n = 20 0.1988 π 0.2239 π 0.2409 π 0.2479 π 0.2492 π 0.2497 π 0.0528 π 0.0720 π 0.0829 π 0.1025 π 0.1089 π 0.1127 π studied in depth in the references Henrion and Seeger (2011) and Seeger and Torki (2013). The following proposition is a nontrivial result borrowed from (Seeger and Torki 2013, Theorem 2.2).…”
Section: Volumetric Center Versus Incentermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a terminology used in Henrion and Seeger (2011), a cone K ∈ n is called non-eccentric if ξ(K ) = ξ(K * ). Non-eccentricity is a geometric property Table 1 Largest observed value (second row) and expected value (third row) of θ(K) n = 3 n = 4 n = 5 n = 10 n = 15 n = 20 0.1988 π 0.2239 π 0.2409 π 0.2479 π 0.2492 π 0.2497 π 0.0528 π 0.0720 π 0.0829 π 0.1025 π 0.1089 π 0.1127 π studied in depth in the references Henrion and Seeger (2011) and Seeger and Torki (2013).…”
Section: Volumetric Center Versus Incentermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A problem closely related to (18) is that of finding a largest ball centered at a unit vector and contained in a given Q ∈ (R n ):…”
Section: Remark 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…generated by a finite collection {c i } m i=1 of unit vectors. Suppose that K is pointed and let (y K , s K ) be the solution to (18). Then the boundary E(y K , s K ) = {x ∈ R n : s K x = y K , x } of the revolution cone (y K , s K ) contains at least two of the c i 's.…”
Section: Lemma 221 Let M ≥ 2 Consider a Polyhedral Convex Conementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the general theory of incenters and circumcenters one knows that ξ(K ), η(K ) is positive, where y, x = y T x stands for the usual inner product of R n . Henrion and Seeger (2011) suggest to measure the degree of eccentricity of K in terms of the angle ψ(K ) := arccos ξ (K ), η(K ) between incenter and circumcenter. A large value of ψ(K ) indicates that K is highly eccentric.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%