Abstract:We discuss some extremality issues concerning the circumradius, the inradius, and the condition number of a closed convex cone in R n . The condition number refers to the ratio between the circumradius and the inradius. We also study the eccentricity of a closed convex cone, which is a coefficient that measures to which extent the circumcenter differs from the incenter.
“…Non-eccentricity is a geometric property Table 1 Largest observed value (second row) and expected value (third row) of θ(K) n = 3 n = 4 n = 5 n = 10 n = 15 n = 20 0.1988 π 0.2239 π 0.2409 π 0.2479 π 0.2492 π 0.2497 π 0.0528 π 0.0720 π 0.0829 π 0.1025 π 0.1089 π 0.1127 π studied in depth in the references Henrion and Seeger (2011) and Seeger and Torki (2013). The following proposition is a nontrivial result borrowed from (Seeger and Torki 2013, Theorem 2.2).…”
Section: Volumetric Center Versus Incentermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a terminology used in Henrion and Seeger (2011), a cone K ∈ n is called non-eccentric if ξ(K ) = ξ(K * ). Non-eccentricity is a geometric property Table 1 Largest observed value (second row) and expected value (third row) of θ(K) n = 3 n = 4 n = 5 n = 10 n = 15 n = 20 0.1988 π 0.2239 π 0.2409 π 0.2479 π 0.2492 π 0.2497 π 0.0528 π 0.0720 π 0.0829 π 0.1025 π 0.1089 π 0.1127 π studied in depth in the references Henrion and Seeger (2011) and Seeger and Torki (2013).…”
Section: Volumetric Center Versus Incentermentioning
This is the second part of an extensive work on volumetric centers and least partial volumes of proper cones in R n . The first part [cf. Seeger and Torki (Beiträge Algebra Geom, 2014) Centers and partial volumes of convex cones. I: Basic theory] was devoted to presenting the general theory. We now treat some more specialized issues. The notion of least partial volume is a reasonable alternative to the classical concept of solid angle, whereas the concept of volumetric center is an alternative to the old notion of incenter.
“…Non-eccentricity is a geometric property Table 1 Largest observed value (second row) and expected value (third row) of θ(K) n = 3 n = 4 n = 5 n = 10 n = 15 n = 20 0.1988 π 0.2239 π 0.2409 π 0.2479 π 0.2492 π 0.2497 π 0.0528 π 0.0720 π 0.0829 π 0.1025 π 0.1089 π 0.1127 π studied in depth in the references Henrion and Seeger (2011) and Seeger and Torki (2013). The following proposition is a nontrivial result borrowed from (Seeger and Torki 2013, Theorem 2.2).…”
Section: Volumetric Center Versus Incentermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a terminology used in Henrion and Seeger (2011), a cone K ∈ n is called non-eccentric if ξ(K ) = ξ(K * ). Non-eccentricity is a geometric property Table 1 Largest observed value (second row) and expected value (third row) of θ(K) n = 3 n = 4 n = 5 n = 10 n = 15 n = 20 0.1988 π 0.2239 π 0.2409 π 0.2479 π 0.2492 π 0.2497 π 0.0528 π 0.0720 π 0.0829 π 0.1025 π 0.1089 π 0.1127 π studied in depth in the references Henrion and Seeger (2011) and Seeger and Torki (2013).…”
Section: Volumetric Center Versus Incentermentioning
This is the second part of an extensive work on volumetric centers and least partial volumes of proper cones in R n . The first part [cf. Seeger and Torki (Beiträge Algebra Geom, 2014) Centers and partial volumes of convex cones. I: Basic theory] was devoted to presenting the general theory. We now treat some more specialized issues. The notion of least partial volume is a reasonable alternative to the classical concept of solid angle, whereas the concept of volumetric center is an alternative to the old notion of incenter.
“…A problem closely related to (18) is that of finding a largest ball centered at a unit vector and contained in a given Q ∈ (R n ):…”
Section: Remark 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…generated by a finite collection {c i } m i=1 of unit vectors. Suppose that K is pointed and let (y K , s K ) be the solution to (18). Then the boundary E(y K , s K ) = {x ∈ R n : s K x = y K , x } of the revolution cone (y K , s K ) contains at least two of the c i 's.…”
Section: Lemma 221 Let M ≥ 2 Consider a Polyhedral Convex Conementioning
Let {a i : i ∈ I } be a finite set in R n . The illumination problem addressed in this work is about selecting an apex z in a prescribed set Z ⊆ R n and a unit vector y ∈ R n so that the conic light beamcaptures every a i and, at the same time, it has a sharpness coefficient s ∈ [0, 1] as large as possible.
“…From the general theory of incenters and circumcenters one knows that ξ(K ), η(K ) is positive, where y, x = y T x stands for the usual inner product of R n . Henrion and Seeger (2011) suggest to measure the degree of eccentricity of K in terms of the angle ψ(K ) := arccos ξ (K ), η(K ) between incenter and circumcenter. A large value of ψ(K ) indicates that K is highly eccentric.…”
This paper addresses the issue of estimating the largest possible eccentricity in the class of proper cones of R n. The eccentricity of a proper cone is defined as the angle between the incenter and the circumcenter of the cone. This work establishes also various geometric and topological results concerning the concept of eccentricity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.