2008
DOI: 10.5516/net.2008.40.1.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condition Monitoring Using Empirical Models: Technical Review and Prospects for Nuclear Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models can be very sophisticated and often require the use of complex computer algorithms and long-term calculations. However, they can simulate the tracks behaviour in different conditions, even before its exploitation, and help to define tracks most important properties needed for improving its exploitation behaviour [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Choosing the Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models can be very sophisticated and often require the use of complex computer algorithms and long-term calculations. However, they can simulate the tracks behaviour in different conditions, even before its exploitation, and help to define tracks most important properties needed for improving its exploitation behaviour [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Choosing the Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anticlockwise flow in Figure 4 shows architecture and greedy layer by layer unsupervised pretraining procedure for all hidden layers in DAASM stack. For each hidden layer ℎ , a DAE block is shown, in which an encoder function (⋅) and a decoder function (⋅) are learnt by minimizing the loss function corresponding to fault free reconstruction of the inputs as in relation (6). For the case of first hidden layer ℎ 1 , the corresponding DAE-1 is trained directly on sensor data using ( ,̂, ) loss function in (6).…”
Section: Daasm Architecture and Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each hidden layer ℎ , a DAE block is shown, in which an encoder function (⋅) and a decoder function (⋅) are learnt by minimizing the loss function corresponding to fault free reconstruction of the inputs as in relation (6). For the case of first hidden layer ℎ 1 , the corresponding DAE-1 is trained directly on sensor data using ( ,̂, ) loss function in (6). However, hidden layers ℎ 2 through ℎ 3 are learnt on data from preceding hidden layer activations using recursive relation in (7).…”
Section: Daasm Architecture and Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Detailed reviews of state estimation and fault detection methods are given in Hashemian (1995), Hines and Seibert (2006), Heo (2008), and Ramachandran et al (2010). State estimation and fault detection will be briefly described in the following sections.…”
Section: Monitoring Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%