2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2004)9:3(268)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condition Evolution in Bridge Management Systems and Corrosion-Induced Deterioration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The major difficulty in the assessment of P lies in the number of parameters a ij to estimate. Various studies consider a Markov matrix with two parameters for state (Pappas et al, 2001, Roelfstra et al, 2004. In this case, the transition probabilities can be estimated from a non-linear regression.…”
Section: Transition Matrices For Modeling Chloride Ingressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major difficulty in the assessment of P lies in the number of parameters a ij to estimate. Various studies consider a Markov matrix with two parameters for state (Pappas et al, 2001, Roelfstra et al, 2004. In this case, the transition probabilities can be estimated from a non-linear regression.…”
Section: Transition Matrices For Modeling Chloride Ingressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the transition probabilities can be estimated from a non-linear regression. However, complex stochastic phenomena cannot be modeled by a transition matrix with two transition probabilities per state (Roelfstra et al 2004). To solve this problem, the proposed method searches the values a ij that minimize the difference between the probabilities estimated from simulations and the obtained from the Markov model (equation [5]).…”
Section: Transition Matrices For Modeling Chloride Ingressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , m. With such a description we can achieve a certain compatibility with the condition rating of existing infrastructure management systems 5),6),7),8),9), 10) . The states are numbered in our case in such a way, that state 1 corresponds to no deterioration, state 2 corresponds to very minor deterioration, and so on, until state m, which denotes structural failure, that is, structural collapse.…”
Section: Deterioration Model (1) Condition Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As will be shown in this paper, for this purpose not only all significant life-cycle costs, such as construction, failure, inspection and rehabilitation costs have to be taken into account, as is done, for example, in existing bridge management systems 5),6),7),8),9), 10) , but also the, in general, state-or time-dependent benefit rates. Because only by specifying both costs and benefits we can rationally define acceptable risks, acceptable failure rates and, consequently, optimal lifetimes 11) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) will be reduced by 139 multiplying the water diffusivity with the coefficient (1-R) (Roelfstra et al 2004). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%