2006
DOI: 10.1021/ma0613741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Condensation of Arylboroxine Structures on Lewis Basic Copolymers as a Noncovalent Strategy toward Polymer Functionalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 H NMR is the most reliable method for distinguishing boronic acid, boronate ester, and boroxine since the aromatic protons ortho to the boron atom show distinct chemical shifts for all three states 11,20–22 . 1 H NMR analysis ( d 6 ‐acetone/D 2 O) for all boronic acid‐containing polymers show characteristic resonances at 7.9 ppm and are devoid of boronate ester resonances at 7.8 and 1.3 ppm (see Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 H NMR is the most reliable method for distinguishing boronic acid, boronate ester, and boroxine since the aromatic protons ortho to the boron atom show distinct chemical shifts for all three states 11,20–22 . 1 H NMR analysis ( d 6 ‐acetone/D 2 O) for all boronic acid‐containing polymers show characteristic resonances at 7.9 ppm and are devoid of boronate ester resonances at 7.8 and 1.3 ppm (see Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, binding Lewis basic species such as the N,N-dimethylaminomethyl group of 3a to arylboroxine rings decreases arylboroxine Lewis acidity and generally results in upfield 19 F NMR shifts relative to the corresponding unligated arylboroxine. 22 Therefore, the chemical shift of the −110 ppm 19 F resonance, assigned as 3a, is justified based on the relative position of the resonances of 4a and 2a. In addition, the chemical shift of the resonance assigned as 3a in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 3 a,b, the peaks for the 2′ and 3′ hydroxyl groups disappeared, and the 2′ and 3′ proton signals were shifted considerably upfield upon the addition of 11c . In Figure 3 c–e, it was assumed that the peaks at 21 ppm, 28 ppm and 32 ppm correspond to a 2,4,6-tris[4-(trifluorometyl)phenyl]boroxine pyridine complex, the proposed structure of which is 49 (some NMR spectra of boroxine pyridine complexes were reported [ 69 , 70 , 71 ]), 11c or 2,4,6-tris[4-(trifluorometyl)phenyl]boroxine and the desired boronic ester 47 , respectively. In Figure 3 f–h, we assumed that the peaks at −63.3 ppm, −63.2 ppm and −62.8 ppm correspond to 47 , 11c or 2,4,6-tris[4-(trifluorometyl)phenyl]boroxine and 49 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%