2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concussion classification via deep learning using whole-brain white matter fiber strains

Abstract: Developing an accurate and reliable injury predictor is central to the biomechanical studies of traumatic brain injury. State-of-the-art efforts continue to rely on empirical, scalar metrics based on kinematics or model-estimated tissue responses explicitly pre-defined in a specific brain region of interest. They could suffer from loss of information. A single training dataset has also been used to evaluate performance but without cross-validation. In this study, we developed a deep learning approach for concu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of a response vector over scalar metrics in injury prediction was supported by a recent study, where feature-based machine learning/deep learning utilizing all of the voxelwise WM fiber strains (vs. element-wise maximum principal strain evaluated here) significantly outperformed all scalar injury metrics via conventional logistic regression for concussion prediction. Comparable performances were also retained when using a subset of the response vector via feature-selection 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of a response vector over scalar metrics in injury prediction was supported by a recent study, where feature-based machine learning/deep learning utilizing all of the voxelwise WM fiber strains (vs. element-wise maximum principal strain evaluated here) significantly outperformed all scalar injury metrics via conventional logistic regression for concussion prediction. Comparable performances were also retained when using a subset of the response vector via feature-selection 5 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most biomechanical studies have so far focused on identifying the “best” injury predictor to assess the probability of the occurrence of a binary injury 8,15,17,19,27,28,30,33,40,44 . There is a large gap of knowledge on how external head impacts, through induced brain responses at the time of impact, are related to subsequent, specific neurological disorder and injury severity often observed at a later time in the clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LOOCV was selected to maximize our training set for validation given our small dataset size (n = 53) and for the low bias that LOOCV exhibits (Beleites et al, 2005). Other studies have employed LOOCV for the reconstructed football impacts and supplemented with out-of-bootstrap cross-validation to address LOOCV's sometimes high variance, but it did not qualitatively alter their findings (Beleites et al, 2005;Cai et al, 2018). We also reported sensitivity and specificity of the cross-validated predictions.…”
Section: Logistic Regression and Cross Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%