“…Previous studies comparing earlier editions of the two tests produced mixed results but, in general, moderate to high correlations were reported, with the majority ranging from .68 to .88 (Carvajal et al, 1993; Greene, Sapp, & Chissom, 1990; Hollinger & Baldwin, 1990; Lavin, 1996; Lukens, 1990; Lukens & Hurrell, 1996; Prewett & Matavich, 1994; Roid, 2003b; Rust & Lindstrom, 1996; Saklofske, Schwean, Yackulic, & Quinn, 1994; Simpson et al, 2002). At times, however, there have been relatively large differences between composite scores on the two tests, with the higher scoring instrument varying across studies (Brown & Morgan, 1991; Lukens & Hurrell, 1996; Minton & Pratt, 2006; Prewett & Matavich, 1994).…”