2019
DOI: 10.3390/medicina55110750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent Validity of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire and Study Short Form 36 for Measuring the Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Foot Problems

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Foot problems may be considered to be a prevalent condition and impact the health-related quality of life (QoL). Considering these Spanish-validated tools, the Foot Health Status questionnaire (FHSQ) may provide a health-related QoL measurement for specific foot conditions and general status. To date, the domains of the FHSQ and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) have not been correlated. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to correlate the domains of the FHSQ and SF-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(105 reference statements)
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants for the control group had no TB (n = 25), whereas study subjects presented with TB abnormalities, such as TB types I, II, and III (n = 25 in each group) [ 23 ] ( Figure 1 ). The exclusion criteria included subjects with medical histories of immunosuppression, neurovascular disorders, neurological conditions, trauma or foot surgery, other foot deformities (plantar fasciopathy, plantar heel pain, metatarsalgia, hallux abductus valgus, toe deformities, plantar neuromas), not completing the writing tasks by oneself, and inability to comply with guidelines about the research and/or accomplish the study requirements [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants for the control group had no TB (n = 25), whereas study subjects presented with TB abnormalities, such as TB types I, II, and III (n = 25 in each group) [ 23 ] ( Figure 1 ). The exclusion criteria included subjects with medical histories of immunosuppression, neurovascular disorders, neurological conditions, trauma or foot surgery, other foot deformities (plantar fasciopathy, plantar heel pain, metatarsalgia, hallux abductus valgus, toe deformities, plantar neuromas), not completing the writing tasks by oneself, and inability to comply with guidelines about the research and/or accomplish the study requirements [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first section presents a high degree of validity related to the content, the evaluation criteria and the construct of the four specific domains to analyse foot health associated with: foot function, foot pain, footwear and condition of foot health, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89–0.95, and high retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.74–0.92 14 . The second section was validated and adapted from the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and presents four domains for the assessment of general health, physical function, social function, and finally vitality 15 , 16 . The third section contains the record of the sociodemographic characteristics corresponding to the clinical history of each participant 16 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, informants filled out the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) 15 . This self-administered questionnaire on health-related quality of life is intended specifically for the foot which is recognised as a validated test 16 , 17 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%