2018
DOI: 10.12968/ijtr.2018.25.6.272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent validity between a portable force plate and instrumented walkway when measuring limits of stability

Abstract: Background: Balance deficits underlie a number of disorders and can exacerbate the primary condition if not addressed. Limits of stability, usually evaluated via force plates, can provide valuable information about balance and associated insufficiencies. A portable instrumented mat used clinically to measure gait characteristics has recently shown potential for limits of stability assessment. The mat also affords the ability to measure proactive control of limits of stability and quantitative information speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Four Square Step Test was performed on a 1.22 m by 1.22 m area of an electronic mat acquiring data at 120 Hz (Zeno Walkway; ProtoKinetics, Haverton, PA, USA) and recorded with the instrument’s software (PKMAS). The system has been validated both for spatiotemporal parameters and center of pressure [ 21 , 22 ] and has previously been used to analyze the Timed-Up-and-Go in subjects with unilateral lower-limb amputation [ 23 ]. Algorithms implemented into the software automatically processed the iFSST, identified the four squares and the successive left/right footprints, then provides spatiotemporal aspects of the footsteps and information about the stepping pattern.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Four Square Step Test was performed on a 1.22 m by 1.22 m area of an electronic mat acquiring data at 120 Hz (Zeno Walkway; ProtoKinetics, Haverton, PA, USA) and recorded with the instrument’s software (PKMAS). The system has been validated both for spatiotemporal parameters and center of pressure [ 21 , 22 ] and has previously been used to analyze the Timed-Up-and-Go in subjects with unilateral lower-limb amputation [ 23 ]. Algorithms implemented into the software automatically processed the iFSST, identified the four squares and the successive left/right footprints, then provides spatiotemporal aspects of the footsteps and information about the stepping pattern.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gait and balance analyses were performed using the PKMAS software package (v.509C3; ProtoKinetics, Havertown, PA) . Primary gait outcome measures were selected to summarize the following 5 independent domains of gait: pace, velocity (cm/s) and step length (cm); rhythm, step time (seconds); variability, coefficient of variation (%) of step length; asymmetry, step time asymmetry (seconds; ie, the difference in step time between the left and right steps) and step length asymmetry (ie, the left–right step length); postural control, step width and step width coefficient of variation (%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gait and balance analyses were performed using the PKMAS software package (v.509C3; ProtoKinetics, Havertown, PA). 13,14 Primary gait outcome measures were selected to summarize the following 5 independent domains of gait: pace, velocity (cm/s) and step length (cm); rhythm, step time (seconds); variability, coefficient of variation (%) of step length; asymmetry, step time asymmetry (seconds; ie, the difference in step time between the left and right steps) and step length asymmetry (ie, the left-right step length); postural control, step width and step width coefficient of variation (%). To capture a summary of the participants' balance impairments, the following outcome measures were calculated during the eyes-open and eyes-closed trials: x and y range (cm), anterior-posterior and mediolateral root mean square of the center or pressure (COP) displacement (cm), mean COP length (cm), COP velocity (cm/s), and max COP velocity (cm/s).…”
Section: R B D P a T I E N T S H A V E S U B T L E G A I T I M P A mentioning
confidence: 99%