2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent optimization of mountain railway alignment and station locations using a distance transform algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al [29,30] used a genetic algorithm and bidirectional distance transform to optimize railway alignments in mountainous terrain. Concurrent optimization of mountain railway alignment and station locations using a distance transform algorithm was recently reported by Pu et al [31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [29,30] used a genetic algorithm and bidirectional distance transform to optimize railway alignments in mountainous terrain. Concurrent optimization of mountain railway alignment and station locations using a distance transform algorithm was recently reported by Pu et al [31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, based on the bidirectional DT, Pu et al. () optimized railway alignment and terminal locations concurrently by handling more constraints compared with separately optimizing railway alignment or terminal locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual goal of alignment optimization is to find an alignment with the lowest comprehensive cost between two given endpoints. In the literature, representative methods for optimizing alignments include particle swarm optimization (Shafahi & Bagherian, 2013;Babapour, Naghdi, Ghajar, & Mortazavi, 2018;Pu et al, 2019), two-stage method that combines global optimization methods with a gradient type algorithm (Vázquez-Méndez, Casal, Santamarina, & Castro, 2018), derivative-free algorithms (Mondal, Lucet, & Hare, 2015), discrete algorithms (Hirpa, Hare, Lucet, Pushak, & Tesfamariam, 2016;, dynamic programming (Hogan, 1973;Li, Pu, Zhao, & Liu, 2013), mixed integer programming (Easa & Mehmood, 2008), linear programming (Revelle, Whitlatch, & Wright, 1996;Chapra & Canale, 2006), network optimization (Trietsch, 1987a(Trietsch, , 1987b), heuristic neighborhood search with mixed integer programming (Cheng & Lee, 2006;Lee, Tsou, & Liu, 2009), calculus of variations (Howard, Bramnick, & Shaw, 1968), numerical search (Robinson, 1973), enumeration (Easa, 1988), average-end-area method for improving earthwork calculation accuracy from 2D to 3D (Cheng & Jiang, 2013), genetic algorithms (Maji & Jha, 2009, and distance transforms (DTs) (de Smith, 2006;Li et al, 2016;Li et al, 2017;Pu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jha [2] expanded upon the Jong and Schonfeld [1] highway alignment optimization model by considering the spatial analysis environment, in order to develop a geographic information system-based highway optimization model. Several studies specifically explored railway alignment optimization in mountainous terrain [3][4][5]. Lai and Schonfeld [6] jointly optimized the alignment of rail transit and its station locations, given that the location of a station can effect demand distributions and spacing between stations can affect travel times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%