2009
DOI: 10.2113/gsrocky.44.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent growth of uplifts with dissimilar orientations in the southern Green River Basin, Wyoming: Implications for Paleocene-Eocene patterns of foreland shortening

Abstract: The diverse orientations of Precambrian-involved and fault-bounded uplifts in the Rocky Mountain foreland region seem difficult to reconcile with the inferred Paleocene-Eocene shortening direction and plate convergence. Some have hypothesized that the shortening direction rotated as much as 90° over time, whereas others have hypothesized a relatively stable strain field involving concurrent oblique slip on faults with varied strikes.The stratigraphic thicknesses of the synorogenic Paleocene-Eocene Fort Union, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wavelength and magnitude of the lithospheric deflection, which is represented by the width and depth of the foreland basin, are dependent on lithospheric stiffness and size (width and height) of the mountain load [Turcotte and Schubert, 1982;Watts, 2001]. Once the influence of sediment loading on basin subsidence is accounted for, the thickness and spatial variations of the preserved strata in the foreland basin can be used to model lithospheric stiffness and corresponding size of the mountain load [e.g., Jordan, 1981 [Keefer, 1965;Curry, 1971;Johnson and Andersen, 2009;Finn et al, 2010] ( Figure 2). This is consistent with flexural subsidence caused by the tectonic loading of the Laramide ranges [e.g., Hagen et al, 1985;Fan and Carrapa, 2014].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wavelength and magnitude of the lithospheric deflection, which is represented by the width and depth of the foreland basin, are dependent on lithospheric stiffness and size (width and height) of the mountain load [Turcotte and Schubert, 1982;Watts, 2001]. Once the influence of sediment loading on basin subsidence is accounted for, the thickness and spatial variations of the preserved strata in the foreland basin can be used to model lithospheric stiffness and corresponding size of the mountain load [e.g., Jordan, 1981 [Keefer, 1965;Curry, 1971;Johnson and Andersen, 2009;Finn et al, 2010] ( Figure 2). This is consistent with flexural subsidence caused by the tectonic loading of the Laramide ranges [e.g., Hagen et al, 1985;Fan and Carrapa, 2014].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isopach maps used in 2-D flexural subsidence modeling, modified fromKeefer [1965],Curry [1971],Johnson andAndersen [2009], andFinn et al [2010]. Unit of contour intervals is meter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower Eocene strata in the Wind River Basin thicken toward the Owl Creek and Bighorn Mountains to the northeast of the basin, with a greater sedimentation rate in the lower Eocene than in the Paleocene [ Keefer , ]. Paleocene strata in the northeastern Green River Basin thicken toward the Wind River Range [ Carroll et al ., ], and lower Eocene strata in the southern Green River Basin thicken toward the Uinta Mountains [ Johnson and Andersen , , and references therein]. These observations suggest that although the segmentation of the Laramide intermontane basins was initiated during the latest Cretaceous [ Dickinson et al ., ], topographic loading of the Bighorn, Owl Creek, Wind River, and Uinta Mountains generated local depocenters mainly during the late Paleocene–early Eocene.…”
Section: Laramide Intermontane Basin Subsidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isopachs of the late Paleocene–early Eocene strata in the Powder River, Bighorn, Wind River, and Green River basins. Contours are in 600 m. The isopachs of the Bighorn Basin and Powder River Basin include undifferentiated Fort Union Formation and Willwood/Wasatch Formation; isopach of the Wind River Basin is for the lower Eocene Wind River Formation, isopach of the Green River Basin is for the Paleocene–middle Eocene Fort Union, Wasatch, and Green River formations [ Keefer , ; Parker and Jones , ; Fox and Higley , ; Hoy and Ridgway , ; Johnson and Andersen , ]. See Figure for the abbreviations.…”
Section: Laramide Intermontane Basin Subsidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…30-45 Ma (e.g., Dickinson et al, 1988;Gries, 1983;Bird, 1998;Cross, 1986). Although there are differences between different workers in inferred slip azimuths and timing on individual structures (e.g., Bird, 1998;Gries, 1983;Johnson and Anderson, 2009), the overall orientation of shortening across the orogen is northeast-southwest (Bird, 1998;Erslev, 1993). Total shortening estimates have ranged from 43 to 120 km across the Wyoming part of the orogen (Bird, 1998;Chapin and Cather, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%