2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent grain boundary motion and grain rotation under an applied stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it appears that direct experimental evidence for zero free grain boundary energies, i.e., the absence of grooving at grain boundaries intersecting a free surface, does not exist. An additional complication is found in the work of Gorkaya et al 11) who have shown that grain boundary migration may be driven not only by the grain boundary free energy, but also by an externally applied shear stress. Therefore, even when the grain boundary free energy is zero, grain coarsening may occur during mechanical testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Also, it appears that direct experimental evidence for zero free grain boundary energies, i.e., the absence of grooving at grain boundaries intersecting a free surface, does not exist. An additional complication is found in the work of Gorkaya et al 11) who have shown that grain boundary migration may be driven not only by the grain boundary free energy, but also by an externally applied shear stress. Therefore, even when the grain boundary free energy is zero, grain coarsening may occur during mechanical testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The GB S is considered to be of a mixed type, with both tilt and twist components, where the misorientation is given by Θ = I + θ 1 (e 1 ×) + θ 3 (e 3 ×) for small θ 1 and θ 3 , where (e×) represents a skew tensor with components given by (e×) jk = ε jlk e l (here ε jlk is the permutation symbol); as discussed in appendix A, θ 1 and θ 3 determine the twist and the tilt characteristic, respectively, of the GB. Whereas the deformation of grains in the wake of a moving GB, under the external loading considered here, is simple shear for a tilt GB, it is more complicated if the GB is of mixed type [7]. The array of edge dislocations is driven by the Peach-Koehler force to move the GB in normal direction while translating the grains parallel to the GB.…”
Section: (A) Bicrystal-imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unlike coarse-grained materials where GB migration and dislocation dynamics dominate grain coarsening and plastic deformation, respectively. The coupled motion has recently been studied theoretically [1,2,5,6], experimentally [7] and with molecular simulations [8]. Although some of these studies have included the effect of junction dynamics [2,8], all of them are restricted to two-dimensional grains and hence applicable only to polycrystals where each grain is columnar and identical in cross section along the length direction; such a restriction requires the GB to have only tilt, and no twist, character.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two general NGG modes have been identified by various researchers, i.e., nano-grain rotation (NGR) and shear-coupled migration (SCM) of grain boundaries [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Moreover, as demonstrated by many experiments and molecular dynamics as well as mesoscale simulations [4,12,13], NGG and SCM usually appear concomitantly. Most recently, Li et al [14] predicted a novel coupling behavior of NGR and SCM in their theoretical model, i.e., under an externally applied load, NGR occurred first, which led to a decrease of the initial misorientation parameter θ 0 of a given GB and subsequently SCM appeared, which was called a cooperative NGR-SCM process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%