AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-4941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent Feed-forward/Feed-back Design for Flexible Structures

Abstract: This paper discusses the concurrent design of a feedforward time-delay filter and a linear state feed-back controller. The optimization is carried out using a quadratic cost functional which weights both, disturbance rejection and control tracking performance. A minimax optimization scheme is employed to achieve robustness with respect to parameter deviations. Analytical gradients are provided for the cost function. This information can be exploited to expedite convergence of the optimization procedure. The pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various improvements and applications of input shaping have been reported [14,15]. The input shaping technique has also been used along with feedback control to optimize the system performance [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In [16][17][18], the concurrent design of the Proportional-Derivative (PD) controller and input shaping was considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various improvements and applications of input shaping have been reported [14,15]. The input shaping technique has also been used along with feedback control to optimize the system performance [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In [16][17][18], the concurrent design of the Proportional-Derivative (PD) controller and input shaping was considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PD controller parameters were chosen to fasten the feedback system response, and the input shaping was designed to eliminate the natural vibration frequency of the PD feedback control system. The same idea was deployed in [19] for the combination of input shaping technique and a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) feedback control system. These works only considered the single mode vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input shapers and the time-delay filters assume that the system being studied is stable. The effect of the feedback controller on the prefilter has recently been studied by Kenison and Singhose [3], Muenchhof and Singh [13], Tenne and Singh [12] etc. Kenison and Singhose [3] study the problem of simultaneous design of a PD controller and an Input shaper for a double integrator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that the concurrent design results in better performance compared to a PD controller. Muenchhof and Singh [13] study the problem of simultaneous design of feedback/feedforward controller to minimize the cost function which include the residual energy in the system and a metric which represents the disturbance rejection capability of the closed loop system. The problem is formulated as a minimax controller which minimize the maximum cost over a hypercube of uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concurrent design is motivated by Muenchhof [11] and its robustness is achieved by minimizing the statistical cost of equation 12. The approximation of the moments of the cost function significantly reduces the computational burden as compared to the "brute-force" minimax approach.…”
Section: Concurrent Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%