Construction Innovation and Process Improvement 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118280294.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent Engineering in Construction

Abstract: CIB Task Group TG33 whose field is Concurrent Engineering in Construction had a brief meeting at the 8th DBMC Conference. The meeting was attended by about 18 members and was chaired by the Joint Coordinator Dr. Chimay Anumba. Dr. Anumba welcomed members to the meeting and reminded them that it was intended to hold a plenary meeting on the occasion of the forthcoming 2nd International Conference on Concurrent Engineering in Construction scheduled for 25th -27th August 1999 at VTT, Espoo, Finland. He then invit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CE is supposed to prevent these kinds of situations. The value perspective is an essential part of CE as it seeks to cut costs by eliminating non-value-adding activities (Love and Gunasekaran, 1997), reducing production times and improving quality (Anumba and Kamara, 2012). The value perspective is present both in the task of improving quality and in recognising non-value-adding activities, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CE is supposed to prevent these kinds of situations. The value perspective is an essential part of CE as it seeks to cut costs by eliminating non-value-adding activities (Love and Gunasekaran, 1997), reducing production times and improving quality (Anumba and Kamara, 2012). The value perspective is present both in the task of improving quality and in recognising non-value-adding activities, i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective coordination, management and collaboration is key to IBS success [2] and fragmentation has been mostly blamed for poor industry performances [19] which ties back to the traditional working system ( [20]; [41]; [43][44]). This disjointed scenario has been connected to many problems of the industry (see [17][18]; [20]; [23]; [45][46][47][48][49][50]) thus, limiting ability of projects to achieve the best of improvement, innovation, time, cost, quality, productivity, and satisfaction ( [22][23][24]). As a result, Joint Effort and Technological Collaboration initiatives have gained a lot of attention to deal with the increasingly complex and specialized skills and knowledge that are required in the construction industry.…”
Section: Joint Effort and Technological Collaboration Among Project S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultimate goal of CE is to satisfy the customers in terms of the ability to provide a low-cost product, reduce time to market and increase product quality. However, the path towards the adoption of CE in the construction industry still faces many challenges [31,32]. The earliest definition of CE is "Concurrent engineering is a systematic approach to integrate and concurrent design of products and related processes, including manufacturing and support.…”
Section: Cementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of CE in the manufacturing industry is one of the main catalysts for adopting it in the construction industry, due to the similarity between the processes of these two industries. Many studies are based on the assumption that construction can be considered as a manufacturing process [31]. Furthermore, the goals and objectives of CE directly address the challenges and problems currently facing the construction industry (as shown in Table 1) [37].…”
Section: Ce In the Construction Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation