A dvances in computational science and engineering have changed profoundly both the artifacts we can realize and the processes by which we realize them. This article looks at the impact of these new technologies on the design of wearable computers covering three main areas: new design tools and approaches, new manufacturing technologies, and new uses of information technologies. We will show how we at the Engineering Design Research Center (EDRC) at Carnegie Mellon have used the wearable computer project as a testbed in which to integrate research on rapid design and manufacturing. In our research, we have designed, manufactured, and used our own tools as well as observing their use by others----where the tools include wearable computers, design analysis programs, and information organization tools. Through this process, we have learned about design education and design practice, and we have uncovered new issues for design research. Figure 1). The computers are designed and built by an interdisciplinary design class which draws students from all the departments affiliated with the EDRC. The development time for each new generation of mobile computer is between four and six months. Each generation provides a learning experience and experimental testbed enabling advancement toward the next generation.We have developed an interdisciplinary concurrent design methodology that is constantly revisited and revised as we design new artifacts and processes. (This methodology is described in more detail in [11].) This methodology has its roots in electronic design, which has been the driving factor in the design of wearable computers. The goal of the design methodology is to allow as much concurrency---in both time and resources---as possible in the design process. The semester is divided into three phases; activities within a phase proceed in parallel and are synchronized at phase boundaries. Resources consist of personnel, hardware platforms, and communications. Members of the design team are dynamically allocated to groups that focus on specific problems. Groups and individuals communicate informally between the synchronization points as well as formally during progress reviews. S . F i n g e r , M . T e r k , E . S u b r a h m a n i a n , C . K a s a b a c h , F . P r i n z , D . P . S i e w i o r e k , A . S m a i l a g i c , J . S t i v o r i c , a n d L . W e i s s