2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent choice for social interaction and amphetamine using conditioned place preference in rats: Effects of age and housing condition

Abstract: Background Social interaction can serve as a natural reward that attenuates drug reward in rats; however, it is unknown if age or housing conditions alter the choice between social interaction and drug. Methods Individually- and pair-housed adolescent and adult rats were tested using conditioned place preference (CPP) in separate experiments in which: (1) social interaction was conditioned against no social interaction; (2) amphetamine (AMPH; 1 mg/kg, s.c.) was conditioned against saline; or (3) social inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
76
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, social reward in adolescent and adult males has been shown to reduce cocaine reward when tested using CPP (Fritz, El Rawas, Klement, et al, 2011; Fritz, El Rawas, Salti, et al, 2011; Thiel, Okun, & Neisewander, 2008), suggesting that social interaction competes with cocaine reward. The current results extend these latter findings by showing that AMPH CPP is also reduced by competing social cues in adolescent females, although the peer-associated compartment was not preferred over the AMPH-associated compartment as shown previously in adolescent males (Yates et al, 2013). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…More recently, social reward in adolescent and adult males has been shown to reduce cocaine reward when tested using CPP (Fritz, El Rawas, Klement, et al, 2011; Fritz, El Rawas, Salti, et al, 2011; Thiel, Okun, & Neisewander, 2008), suggesting that social interaction competes with cocaine reward. The current results extend these latter findings by showing that AMPH CPP is also reduced by competing social cues in adolescent females, although the peer-associated compartment was not preferred over the AMPH-associated compartment as shown previously in adolescent males (Yates et al, 2013). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, there was no compounding effect of SH and adolescent defeat on cocaine self-administration during PR or the 24-hour binge. Some social behaviors, which peak during rat mid-adolescence, are rewarding (Trezza et al 2010), and SH adolescents exhibit increased preference for social contact and engage in social behavior more than group-housed adolescents (Douglas et al 2004; Varlinskaya et al 1999; Yates et al 2013). Thus, social interaction with the resident might be less aversive for SH intruders in the current study to explain the absence of escalated cocaine taking in adulthood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the dependent measure on the postconditioning test, a preference ratio was used which was calculated by dividing the total time spent in the paired context by the total time spent in both the paired and unpaired contexts on this test. The preference ratio is based on previous work by Yates et al [31] and Bardo et al [32]. It has the advantage of easily determining a lack of preference (0.5) and takes into account the amount of time spent in both paired and unpaired contexts on the preference test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%