Concurrent chemoradiotherapy was associated with a higher severe late toxicity rate in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients compared with radiotherapy alone: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
Abstract:BackgroundTo investigate the incidence and risk of severe late toxicity with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.MethodsEligible studies included prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating CCRT versus radiotherapy alone in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and in which data on severe late toxicities were available. Random effects or fixed effect models were applied to obtain the summary incidence, relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).… Show more
“…[5][6][7] Cisplatin and irradiation are known to be toxic to hearing and ototoxicity remains one the most commonly encountered late toxicities for NPC patients treated by CCRT. 25 The incidence rate of developing severe (grade 3 or more) ototoxicity in our series is low (4 year cumulative incidence rate: 3.0%), which was non-inferior to other NPC series treated by CCRT with SIB-VMAT (0%), 26 or CCRT with SIB-IMRT (2.0%). 23 As regards the radiation neuropathy, 1 patient (1.4%) had optic neuropathy so far, but 3 patients (4.4%) developed temporal lobe necrosis, which was mild with limited follow-up.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…In addition to parotid sparing, SIB‐VMAT also provides dosimetric benefits in the critical structures of skull base, temporal lobe, and ear structure for NPC planning . Cisplatin and irradiation are known to be toxic to hearing and ototoxicity remains one the most commonly encountered late toxicities for NPC patients treated by CCRT . The incidence rate of developing severe (grade 3 or more) ototoxicity in our series is low (4 year cumulative incidence rate: 3.0%), which was non‐inferior to other NPC series treated by CCRT with SIB‐VMAT (0%), or CCRT with SIB‐IMRT (2.0%) .…”
Background
To investigate the toxicity, changes of quality of life (QOL), and survival for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with simultaneously integrated boost volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (SIB‐VMAT).
Methods
A total of 68 NPC patients treated by CCRT with SIB‐VMAT technique were collected. QOL was longitudinally assessed by the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and HN35 questionnaires at the 4 time points: baseline, 42.4 Gy (20 fractions), and 3, 12 months after CCRT.
Results
The 4‐year locoregional relapse free, distant metastasis free, failure free, and overall survival rates were 97.0%, 86.4%, 82.0%, and 88.1%, respectively. The 4‐year cumulative incidence rate of late toxicities with grade 3 or more was 3.0%. One year after CCRT, most QOL scales, except some oral related symptoms, recovered to baseline level.
Conclusion
CCRT with SIB‐VMAT produces excellent locoregional control, few severe late toxicity, and good general health status for NPC patients.
“…[5][6][7] Cisplatin and irradiation are known to be toxic to hearing and ototoxicity remains one the most commonly encountered late toxicities for NPC patients treated by CCRT. 25 The incidence rate of developing severe (grade 3 or more) ototoxicity in our series is low (4 year cumulative incidence rate: 3.0%), which was non-inferior to other NPC series treated by CCRT with SIB-VMAT (0%), 26 or CCRT with SIB-IMRT (2.0%). 23 As regards the radiation neuropathy, 1 patient (1.4%) had optic neuropathy so far, but 3 patients (4.4%) developed temporal lobe necrosis, which was mild with limited follow-up.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…In addition to parotid sparing, SIB‐VMAT also provides dosimetric benefits in the critical structures of skull base, temporal lobe, and ear structure for NPC planning . Cisplatin and irradiation are known to be toxic to hearing and ototoxicity remains one the most commonly encountered late toxicities for NPC patients treated by CCRT . The incidence rate of developing severe (grade 3 or more) ototoxicity in our series is low (4 year cumulative incidence rate: 3.0%), which was non‐inferior to other NPC series treated by CCRT with SIB‐VMAT (0%), or CCRT with SIB‐IMRT (2.0%) .…”
Background
To investigate the toxicity, changes of quality of life (QOL), and survival for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with simultaneously integrated boost volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (SIB‐VMAT).
Methods
A total of 68 NPC patients treated by CCRT with SIB‐VMAT technique were collected. QOL was longitudinally assessed by the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and HN35 questionnaires at the 4 time points: baseline, 42.4 Gy (20 fractions), and 3, 12 months after CCRT.
Results
The 4‐year locoregional relapse free, distant metastasis free, failure free, and overall survival rates were 97.0%, 86.4%, 82.0%, and 88.1%, respectively. The 4‐year cumulative incidence rate of late toxicities with grade 3 or more was 3.0%. One year after CCRT, most QOL scales, except some oral related symptoms, recovered to baseline level.
Conclusion
CCRT with SIB‐VMAT produces excellent locoregional control, few severe late toxicity, and good general health status for NPC patients.
“…Therefore, radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of NPC due to its special anatomical position. 6 A strong relationship between radiotherapy and leucopenia has been reported in the literature-65.6% patients with NCP developed mild leucopenia (grade 1-2) and 21.1% developed severe leucopenia (grade 3-4) during treatment. 3 In addition, compared with radiotherapy alone, the overall 10-year survival rate of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is significantly improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…5 Study showed that the incidence of side effects of CCRT was significantly higher than that of radiotherapy alone (30.7% vs 21.7%). 6 A strong relationship between radiotherapy and leucopenia has been reported in the literature-65.6% patients with NCP developed mild leucopenia (grade 1-2) and 21.1% developed severe leucopenia (grade 3-4) during treatment. 7 Till date, most studies on oral nutrition supplementations (ONS) of patients with NCP during CCRT focused on improvement of nutritional status, 8 whereas information is lacking on prevention of myelosuppression which could profoundly affect the progress of CCRT immediately, and even lead to the termination of treatment.…”
Background
The aim of this study is to assess the effect of home enteral nutrition (HEN) on the myelosuppression of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) during the course of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).
Methods
A total of 18 outpatients with NPC administered oral nutritional supplementation intervention at home during the course of CCRT were designated as the HEN group, whereas 36 patients with NPC who had previously completed CCRT were retrospectively included as the control group. Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment, body mass index (BMI), and blood test were evaluated prior to CCRT. During the course of CCRT, blood test was assessed every 2 weeks.
Results
In male patients, hemoglobin (HB) and red blood cell were decreased (P < .05) in both HEN and control group after CCRT, whereas white blood cell (WBC) started to decrease since week 2 of CCRT in the control group but maintained in the HEN group which was significantly higher than the control (5.05 ± 1.29 vs 3.77 ± 1.5, P < .05). In female patients, HB and WBC were reduced in control group during CCRT, whereas these indicators also maintained in the HEN group. Surprisingly, all patients with lower BMI (<24 kg/m2) had a significant increase in platelet (PLT) after CCRT (200.78 ± 58.03 vs 253.00 ± 69.82, P < .05), while had steady HB and WBC values in the HEN group. At the end of CCRT, WBC and PLT of the HEN group were both higher than those in the control group (5.21 ± 1.07 vs 3.37 ± 1.52), (253.00 ± 69.82 vs 165.57 ± 59.56) (P < .05 for both). Our findings suggest that HEN is effective in preventing myelosuppression during CCRT for patients with NPC.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that HEN is effective in preventing myelosuppression during CCRT for patients with NPC.
“…Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for locoregional advanced NPC (LA-NPC) 3,4. Unfortunately, CCRT is associated with significant treatment-related toxicities, including mucositis, odynophagia, dysphagia, xerostomia, and vomiting 5,6. These complications can put patients at risk of malnutrition, thereby compromising treatment tolerance and efficacy, and increasing health care costs 7.…”
Background and aimTo evaluate the impact of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube on nutritional status, treatment-related toxicity, and treatment tolerance in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who underwent chemoradiotherapy.Patients and methodsWe enrolled 133 consecutive non-metastatic NPC (III/IV stage) patients, who were treated with prophylactic PEG feeding before the initiation of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) between June 1, 2010 and June 30, 2014. Meanwhile, another 133 non-PEG patients, who were matched for age, gender, and tumor, node, metastases stage, were selected as historical control cohort. Weight and nutritional status changes from pre-radiotherapy to the end of radiotherapy were evaluated, and treatment tolerance and related acute toxicities were analyzed as well.ResultsWe found that significantly more patients (91.73%) in the PEG group could finish two cycles of CCRT, when compared with those in the non-PEG group (57.89%) (P<0.001). We also indicated that more patients (50.38%) in the non-PEG group experienced weight loss of ≥5%, while the phenomenon was only found in 36.09% patients in the PEG group (P=0.019). In addition, the percentage of patients who lost ≥10% of their weight was similar in these two groups. Changes in albumin and prealbumin levels during radiotherapy in the non-PEG group were higher than those obtained for the PEG group with significant differences (P-values of 0.023 and <0.001, respectively). Furthermore, patients in the PEG group had significantly lower incidence of grade III acute mucositis than those in the non-PEG group (22.56% vs 36.84%, P=0.011). Tube-related complications occurred only in 14 (10.53%) patients in the PEG group, including incision infection of various degrees.ConclusionPEG and intensive nutrition support may help to minimize body weight loss, maintain nutritional status, and offer better treatment tolerance for patients with locally advanced NPC who underwent CCRT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.