1986
DOI: 10.2307/352405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concurrent and Discriminant Validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
373
1
15

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 586 publications
(408 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
10
373
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Sabatelli (1988) reported that the KMSS appeared to establish test-retest reliability as well as criterion-related and construct validity. The KMSS was found to be significantly correlated with the Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Quality of Marriage Index (Schumm et al, 1986).…”
Section: Financial Satisfaction Financial Satisfaction (Fs) Was Measmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sabatelli (1988) reported that the KMSS appeared to establish test-retest reliability as well as criterion-related and construct validity. The KMSS was found to be significantly correlated with the Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Quality of Marriage Index (Schumm et al, 1986).…”
Section: Financial Satisfaction Financial Satisfaction (Fs) Was Measmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMSS) was used to measure relationship satisfaction (Schumm et al, 1986). In the present study, the questions from the KMSS were altered to reflect relationship satisfaction rather than marital satisfaction.…”
Section: Financial Satisfaction Financial Satisfaction (Fs) Was Measmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three-item Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMS) will be adopted to assess the level of marital satisfaction perceived by infertile couples [37]. The 14-item Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) will be utilized to measure the marital adjustment of infertile couples [38].…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one of the most striking anomalies in the literature on couples and marital interactions is that the mean level of marital satisfaction reported by men and women on a self-report measure such as the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale ( Schumm, Paff-Bergen, Hatch, & Obiorah, 1986 ) is roughly 18 points out of a possible 21. Yet the divorce rate in the United States is over 50%.…”
Section: Incongruence Of Implicit and Explicit Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%