2011
DOI: 10.1037/a0024693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concreteness effects in short-term memory: A test of the item-order hypothesis.

Abstract: The following experiments explore word length and concreteness effects in short-term memory within an item-order processing framework. This framework asserts order memory is better for those items that are relatively easy to process at the item level. However, words that are difficult to process benefit at the item level for increased attention/resources being applied. The prediction of the model is that differential item and order processing can be detected in episodic tasks that differ in the degree to which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a second alternative, there has been some suggestion that the concreteness effect is most robust when the memory task demands retrieval of item information rather than order information (Roche, Tolan, & Tehan, 2011;Romani et al, 2008). However, in our experiments the dynamic visual noise manipulation was sufficient to eliminate the concreteness effect in free recall and recognition, which have minimal demands for order information, but insufficient to eliminate it in serial recall, which requires order information.…”
Section: Concreteness Effectsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…As a second alternative, there has been some suggestion that the concreteness effect is most robust when the memory task demands retrieval of item information rather than order information (Roche, Tolan, & Tehan, 2011;Romani et al, 2008). However, in our experiments the dynamic visual noise manipulation was sufficient to eliminate the concreteness effect in free recall and recognition, which have minimal demands for order information, but insufficient to eliminate it in serial recall, which requires order information.…”
Section: Concreteness Effectsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Although not central to our primary question, it is noteworthy that Experiments 2 through 7 replicated the robust concreteness effect on memory (e.g., Begg et al, 1989;Hertzog et al, 2003;Hertzog et al, 2013;Roche, Tolan, & Tehan, 2011;Tauber & Rhodes, 2012;Tullis & Benjamin, 2012). Specifically, participants recalled more concrete words relative to abstract words.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The studies above, however, did not examine forward and backward recall in the same experiment, so it is hard to evaluate the strength of the word length effects in the studies in which there were significant effects. When the two directions are manipulated in the same experiment, word length effects are present in forward recall but absent in backward recall (Bireta et al, 2010;Roche, Tolan, & Tehan, 2011;Surprenant et al, 2011).…”
Section: Word Length In Forward and Backward Serial Recallmentioning
confidence: 99%