2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete Uniaxial Nonlocal Damage-Plasticity Model for Simulating Post-Peak Response of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Columns under Cyclic Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the embedded discontinuity technique 41–43 is introduced to the beam element to consider localized inelastic deformations corresponding to the zones in RC frames where plasticity or damage would concentrate. On the other hand, several advances in Timoshenko fiber beam‐column element have been achieved, such as the multi‐fiber element using strut‐and‐tie models, 44 micro‐plane model, 45 smeared crack models, 46 and damage models 20,47 . The nonlinear behavior of a displacement‐based beam element 27,38 and a force‐based beam element 48,49 is comprehensively investigated based on the damage plasticity model, where the uniaxial Menegotto–Pinto (MP) model of steel reinforcement has been used to describe the sectional behavior of the beam element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the embedded discontinuity technique 41–43 is introduced to the beam element to consider localized inelastic deformations corresponding to the zones in RC frames where plasticity or damage would concentrate. On the other hand, several advances in Timoshenko fiber beam‐column element have been achieved, such as the multi‐fiber element using strut‐and‐tie models, 44 micro‐plane model, 45 smeared crack models, 46 and damage models 20,47 . The nonlinear behavior of a displacement‐based beam element 27,38 and a force‐based beam element 48,49 is comprehensively investigated based on the damage plasticity model, where the uniaxial Menegotto–Pinto (MP) model of steel reinforcement has been used to describe the sectional behavior of the beam element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, several advances in Timoshenko fiber beam-column element have been achieved, such as the multi-fiber element using strut-and-tie models, 44 micro-plane model, 45 smeared crack models, 46 and damage models. 20,47 The nonlinear behavior of a displacement-based beam element 27,38 and a force-based beam element 48,49 is comprehensively investigated based on the damage plasticity model, where the uniaxial Menegotto-Pinto (MP) model of steel reinforcement has been used to describe the sectional behavior of the beam element. However, this model does not consider the shear capacity provided by the stirrups and may underestimate the bearing capacity of the RC members.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a recent works with the goal of simulating the evolution of the stimulated volume during hydraulic fracturing (Sarvaramini et al , 2019) in rocks. This was achieved by introducing an equivalent continuum nonlocal poro-elastic-plastic zone of enhanced permeability for the stimulated region, characterized by an internal length scale (Kenawy et al , 2020). Hence, it is crucial to incorporate the damage while studying the softening behavior in concrete (Jirasek and Desmorat, 2019) and are able to more precisely model crack propagation in concrete (Kurumatania et al , 2019; Poh and Swaddiwudhipong, 2009; Grassl and Jirásek, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%