2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96812-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete Semantics with Coq and CoqHammer

Abstract: The "Concrete Semantics" book gives an introduction to imperative programming languages accompanied by an Isabelle/HOL formalization. In this paper we discuss a re-formalization of the book using the Coq proof assistant. In order to achieve a similar brevity of the formal text we extensively use CoqHammer 3 , as well as Coq Ltac-level automation. We compare the formalization efficiency, compactness, and the readability of the proof scripts originating from a Coq re-formalization of two chapters from the book.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already announced in the introduction, most interactive theorem provers now include the possibility to run some automated theorem provers. Starting with Isabelle [18,20,3,19], hammers can be found in e.g., ACL2 [12], Coq [5] and Lean [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already announced in the introduction, most interactive theorem provers now include the possibility to run some automated theorem provers. Starting with Isabelle [18,20,3,19], hammers can be found in e.g., ACL2 [12], Coq [5] and Lean [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%