2020
DOI: 10.3726/b17077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete Horizons: Romantic Irony in the Poetry of David Malouf and Samuel Wagan Watson

Abstract: I am indebted to more people than I can acknowledge properly here, for even the smallest favours have such a deep impact on the long hard slog that is a PhD. But there are two groups of people to whom I owe a larger debt than most. Firstly, to my colleagues, particularly Hendrick for his support on this long climb and Annika for commiserations and biscuits. The second is the women who have supported me along the way with advice, good conversation, moral support, and endless patience. Thank you for everything C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the purpose for using the concept of Romantic irony is to create a point of reference "which allows contemporary Australian authors to write about the hybrid subject and the hybrid landscape without the need to resolve its contradictions and layers" (Barratt-Peacock, 2020, p. 33). Barratt-Peacock (2020) begins her examination of the theoretical model of Romantic irony by referring to the Romantic perception of space, defined as "the problem of consciousness and subjectivity," and to the matter of "how the ego can determine itself while at the same time being determined by the Other, or being simultaneously subject and object" (p. 46). The scholar incorporates in her discussion Bärbel Frischmann's (2009, p. 85;cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the purpose for using the concept of Romantic irony is to create a point of reference "which allows contemporary Australian authors to write about the hybrid subject and the hybrid landscape without the need to resolve its contradictions and layers" (Barratt-Peacock, 2020, p. 33). Barratt-Peacock (2020) begins her examination of the theoretical model of Romantic irony by referring to the Romantic perception of space, defined as "the problem of consciousness and subjectivity," and to the matter of "how the ego can determine itself while at the same time being determined by the Other, or being simultaneously subject and object" (p. 46). The scholar incorporates in her discussion Bärbel Frischmann's (2009, p. 85;cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barratt-Peacock, 2020, p. 68). Barratt-Peacock (2020) refers to the statements of other scholars (among others Patrick Buckridge, Vivienne Hamilton, Phillip Neilsen or Bridget Grogan) that tend to classify his works as Romantic or Postromantic, considering such aspects as the sublime, transcendence, nature and myth (pp. 69-71).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations