2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete-filled cold-formed steel (CF-CFS) built-up columns under compression: Test and design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CFSTs with regular cross-sections, such as circular, square and rectangular shapes, have been widely investigated [4], yet some research has been conducted on other cross-sectional shapes, for example, Chang et al [5] conducted an experimental and numerical study to investigate the static axial performance of stiffened concrete-filled double-skin steel tubular (CFDST) stub columns with circular and square shapes. In addition, Rahnavard et al [6,7] conducted experimental and numerical analysis on four different cross-section shapes of fabricated concrete-filled cold-formed steel (CF-CFS) short and long columns. For both long and short columns, it was found that the ultimate strengths of the concrete-filled columns were higher than that of hollow columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFSTs with regular cross-sections, such as circular, square and rectangular shapes, have been widely investigated [4], yet some research has been conducted on other cross-sectional shapes, for example, Chang et al [5] conducted an experimental and numerical study to investigate the static axial performance of stiffened concrete-filled double-skin steel tubular (CFDST) stub columns with circular and square shapes. In addition, Rahnavard et al [6,7] conducted experimental and numerical analysis on four different cross-section shapes of fabricated concrete-filled cold-formed steel (CF-CFS) short and long columns. For both long and short columns, it was found that the ultimate strengths of the concrete-filled columns were higher than that of hollow columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on CFST utilising the lightweight CFS sections and lightweight concrete has been getting limited attention. Recently, Rahnavard et al [12] and Rahnavard et al [13] tested lightweight concrete-filled built-up columns composed of the combinations of four press-braked sections in U-, Cand Σ-shaped. Their test results showed EC4 [14] provided non-conservative predictions for columns with 1.05 m, however, the predictions became conservative when supplemented with effective formulation from EC3 [15]; whilst for columns with 3 m length, they found that EC4 [14] with effective width formulations from EC3 [15] yielded close agreement in predicting the axial capacity for square specimens whereas they recommended adopting buckling curve c from EC4 [14] for rectangular specimens to represent the imperfection factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, because the thermal conductivity and specific heat of concrete are low, it can improve the fire behaviour of composite columns. An innovative concrete-filled cold-formed steel (CF-CFS) composite type has recently been presented [1]- [7]. However, up to this stage, only its axial load-bearing capacity [5,6] and fire resistance [1]- [5] have been evaluated, and other aspects, such as design prediction, still need to be explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%