2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete cone failure of single cast-in anchors under tensile loading – A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RHT model assumes that damage accumulates due to inelastic deviatoric strain, which can result in strain softening and reduction in shear stiffness. A broader overview of the tensile behavior of anchors can be found in the review articles [31][32][33] and in the technical volumes. 21,34 The cone breakout failure is assumed to initiate at the lower end of the anchor and propagate to the surface at an angle of 30 to 40 to the horizontal plane.…”
Section: Behavior Of Anchors In Tension Subject To Concrete Cone Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RHT model assumes that damage accumulates due to inelastic deviatoric strain, which can result in strain softening and reduction in shear stiffness. A broader overview of the tensile behavior of anchors can be found in the review articles [31][32][33] and in the technical volumes. 21,34 The cone breakout failure is assumed to initiate at the lower end of the anchor and propagate to the surface at an angle of 30 to 40 to the horizontal plane.…”
Section: Behavior Of Anchors In Tension Subject To Concrete Cone Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RHT model assumes that damage accumulates due to inelastic deviatoric strain, which can result in strain softening and reduction in shear stiffness. A broader overview of the tensile behavior of anchors can be found in the review articles 31–33 and in the technical volumes 21,34 …”
Section: Load Resistance Of Fastenings In Concrete According To the C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PVC tubes were used as molds (Figure 4a). A length of 50 mm from the top of the cylinder was left unbonded, such that during the pull-out, failure was given to the bar pull-out and not to an incorrect tensile failure of the mortar cylinder [33,34]. Plastic pipes were used to create the bond break (Figure 4b) and in order to avoid the formation of voids, the compaction of the fresh mortar was carried out manually with a rod (Figure 4c).…”
Section: Cylindrical Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When subjected to tensile loading, it exhibits the following failure modes: steel failure, pullout failure, side-face blowout, concrete splitting failure, and concrete cone failure (Hayek 2023) (Figure 1). The specific failure mode depends on parameters such as concrete compressive strength, embedment depths, steel strength, edge distance, spacing between headed bars, and other variables, as discussed in detail by Karmokar et al (2021). In recent decades, the successful use of a headed bar as a replacement for the traditional method has been demonstrated in experimental research studies by DeVries (1996), Thompson et al (2005), Ghimire et al (2019), Ferreira et al (2021), and Santana et al (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%