2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06548-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical excision for breast cancer tumor grade and biomarkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown CNB to be almost as accurate as open excisional biopsy in diagnosing breast disease [16], and to have an excellent agreement between diagnosis made by examination of CNB and surgical specimens [17,18]. This concordance is also observed in the context of histopathological biomarkers such as ER, PR and HER2, indicating that retesting for surgical excision may not be necessary [19,20]. All this means that CNB is well established as an important diagnostic tool in diagnosing breast cancer and it is now considered the initial method of choice for diagnosing breast disease [15,16,18,[21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Previous studies have shown CNB to be almost as accurate as open excisional biopsy in diagnosing breast disease [16], and to have an excellent agreement between diagnosis made by examination of CNB and surgical specimens [17,18]. This concordance is also observed in the context of histopathological biomarkers such as ER, PR and HER2, indicating that retesting for surgical excision may not be necessary [19,20]. All this means that CNB is well established as an important diagnostic tool in diagnosing breast cancer and it is now considered the initial method of choice for diagnosing breast disease [15,16,18,[21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Core needle biopsy (CNB) is less invasive and more cost-effective than excisional biopsy, and it is currently recommended as the first-line diagnostic modality [ 7 ]. Many studies have explored the reliability of biomarker testing using CNB compared with ground-truth surgical biomarker results and have reported favorable outcomes [ 8 10 ]. Although evaluation of HER2 status using CNB was considered reliable, such results were based on a binary classification system, which distinguishes HER2-positive from HER2-negative tumors [ 11 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, technical and preanalytical factors may also affect the accuracy of HER2 testing. In clinical practice, preoperative core needle biopsy (CNB) is the standard procedure for breast cancer diagnosis and neoadjuvant regimen decision [ 10 , 11 ] due to its high accuracy similar to that of surgical excision specimen (SES) samples in histology and estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 status determination [ 12 , 13 ]. Nevertheless, owing to the relatively small sample size and tumor heterogeneity, there is inevitable discordance in biomarker assessment between CNB and SES samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%