2013
DOI: 10.1111/jan.12147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concordance: a concept analysis

Abstract: The results clarified a distinct and currently missing research agenda.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(107 reference statements)
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concordance is defined as ‘the process of enlightened communication between the person and the healthcare professional leading to an agreed treatment and ongoing assessment of this as the optimal course’ (Snowden et al . ). The concept of concordance focusing on the process should be examined in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concordance is defined as ‘the process of enlightened communication between the person and the healthcare professional leading to an agreed treatment and ongoing assessment of this as the optimal course’ (Snowden et al . ). The concept of concordance focusing on the process should be examined in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally, the concept of adherence is limited to the degree to which a person appropriately follows agreed on recommendations for the management of DM, not the process. Concordance is defined as 'the process of enlightened communication between the person and the healthcare professional leading to an agreed treatment and ongoing assessment of this as the optimal course' (Snowden et al 2014). The concept of concordance focusing on the process should be examined in future studies.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this might be because different methods of measurement explore different components of medication adherence (Lehmann et al 2014) or that particularly subjective instruments do not measure the same concepts of adherence (Kikkert et al 2008). This is hardly surprising, as the conceptual definition of the terms 'compliance', 'adherence', and 'concordance' vary and partly overlap, resulting in methodological weaknesses (Bissonnette 2008;Snowden et al 2014;Vrijens et al 2012). According to the original definitions, 'compliance' is the extent to which a person's behaviour coincides with medical or health advice (Vrijens et al 2012), while 'adherence' emphasizes the therapeutic alliance established between the patient and the professional and their agreed decision-making (Horne 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). This framework has been used previously by the authors to systematically analyse complex literature and illuminate discrete elements of social processes such as how, where and why a concept may occur (Snowden, Martin, Mathers, & Donnell, ). It is not the purpose of this review to conduct a full concept analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%