2016
DOI: 10.5565/rev/papers.2268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concluding reflections: ‘Care circulation’ in an increasingly mobile world: Further thoughts

Abstract: In this paper, Laura Merla and Loretta Baldassar address some of the key critiques that were formulated in this symposium on the 'care circulation" perspective these two authors offered in their edited volume entitled "Transnational Families, Migration and the Circulation of Care". Here, they focus in particular on three themes: care as social capital, the need to bring back 'the political', and the (dis)-embodiment of care practices. They highlight in particular that 'care chains' and 'care circulation' shoul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…‘Flow of care’ related to the presentation of negotiated, reciprocal, and shared family collective informal care was based on ability, availability, and capacity to care, occurring in motion, fluidly, through time and space as the care receivers transitioned and moved geographically to be with family as they aged and/or family moved to be with them. In addition to being consistent with an Ethics of Care framework, this notion develops further the work related to the circulation of care being developed by Baldassar and Merla (2014) ; Merla & Baldassar, 2016 ). The concept of care circulation offers a broad view on transnational care through its focus on ‘the reciprocal, multidirectional, and asymmetrical exchange of care that fluctuates over the life course and within transnational family networks subject to the political, economic, cultural, and social contexts of both sending and receiving societies’ ( Baldassar & Merla, 2014 , p. 25).…”
Section: Discussion: Who Exactly Is ‘The’ Carer and Where Is This Casupporting
confidence: 59%
“…‘Flow of care’ related to the presentation of negotiated, reciprocal, and shared family collective informal care was based on ability, availability, and capacity to care, occurring in motion, fluidly, through time and space as the care receivers transitioned and moved geographically to be with family as they aged and/or family moved to be with them. In addition to being consistent with an Ethics of Care framework, this notion develops further the work related to the circulation of care being developed by Baldassar and Merla (2014) ; Merla & Baldassar, 2016 ). The concept of care circulation offers a broad view on transnational care through its focus on ‘the reciprocal, multidirectional, and asymmetrical exchange of care that fluctuates over the life course and within transnational family networks subject to the political, economic, cultural, and social contexts of both sending and receiving societies’ ( Baldassar & Merla, 2014 , p. 25).…”
Section: Discussion: Who Exactly Is ‘The’ Carer and Where Is This Casupporting
confidence: 59%
“…These examples offer strong arguments for considering older people in transnational families as important agents of transnational solidarities and encourage a more systematic examination of the role of the zero generation from a ''care circulation'' perspective. Developed by Merla and Baldassar (2016), this approach provides both a ''conceptual framework and a methodological lens'' to study care exchange mechanisms within transnational families. From this perspective, observing care giving across borders and life course allows ''to capture all the actors involved in family life as well as the full extent of their care activity, including practical, emotional and symbolic, that defines their membership in a family'' (Merla and Baldassar 2016: 276).…”
Section: Transnational Grandparenting In the Digital Age: A Theoreticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, observing care giving across borders and life course allows ''to capture all the actors involved in family life as well as the full extent of their care activity, including practical, emotional and symbolic, that defines their membership in a family'' (Merla and Baldassar 2016: 276). Moreover, within this framework, transnational family scholars focus on various factors shaping processes of care circulation, whereas institutional contexts merge with family configurations and individual resources (Kilkey and Merla 2014;Merla 2014;Merla and Baldassar 2016;Nedelcu and Wyss 2016). As a result, care arrangements within transnational families may strongly vary according to origin and host countries, family life course, class and gender factors, and transnational resources.…”
Section: Transnational Grandparenting In the Digital Age: A Theoreticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, while stressing the role of the macro determinants cited above, Merla (2014: 128) emphasizes 'the importance of combining an analysis of practices related to the circulation of care at the macro, meso and micro levels'. This implies paying attention to other influential elements, including community and family networks, family life course, gender, age and socio-economic status (Baldassar 2007(Baldassar , 2008(Baldassar , 2014Baldassar et al 2007;Merla and Baldassar 2016).…”
Section: Zero-generation's Role In Transnational Families: Theoreticamentioning
confidence: 99%