2017
DOI: 10.1002/stem.2637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concise Review: Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Drug Discovery for Mitochondrial Disease

Abstract: High attrition rates and loss of capital plague the drug discovery process. This is particularly evident for mitochondrial disease that typically involves neurological manifestations and is caused by nuclear or mitochondrial DNA defects. This group of heterogeneous disorders is difficult to target because of the variability of the symptoms among individual patients and the lack of viable modeling systems. The use of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) might significantly improve the search for effective the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the above, we plan to test the rescuing activity of the β32_33 peptide on specialized and differentiated cells and organoids, such as minibrains, 24,25 which are increasingly been developed from induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) reprogrammed from primary patient‐derived cell cultures 26‐28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the above, we plan to test the rescuing activity of the β32_33 peptide on specialized and differentiated cells and organoids, such as minibrains, 24,25 which are increasingly been developed from induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) reprogrammed from primary patient‐derived cell cultures 26‐28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike in iNs, each iPSC line is a clonal derivative of one single fibroblast. Due to the fact that iPSC reprogramming and expansion are highly selective processes, the generation of heteroplasmic iPSC lines from mtDNA disease patients allows comparison of “mutation-rich” to “mutation-free” iPSC lines from the same donor (Fujikura et al, 2012; Inak et al, 2017). While this is a clear advantage for iPSCs when it comes to the investigation of a certain mtDNA mutation, such model iPSC lines do not necessarily reflect the genetic state in a patient’s cells (Folmes et al, 2013; Hatakeyama et al, 2015; Hämäläinen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of these different differentiation protocols has facilitated research on many neurological diseases using iPSCs. The current state of this research has been recently reviewed for a range of diseases (Gibbs et al, 2018;Inak et al, 2017;McKinney, 2017;Poon et al, 2017;Tamburini and Li, 2017) including Parkinson's disease (Cobb et al, 2018;Singh Dolt et al, 2017), Alzheimer's disease (Arber et al, 2017;Robbins and Price, 2017), amytrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia (Guo et al, 2017;Preza et al, 2016), Huntington's disease (Tousley and Kegel-Gleason, 2016), childhood neurological diseases (Barral and Kurian, 2016;Santos and Tiscornia, 2017), and psychiatric disorders (Adegbola et al, 2017;Watmuff et al, 2017). These reviews cover differentiation of specific neuronal subtypes and relevant disease phenotypes observed in these cells, therefore these topics will not be covered here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%