Concevoir des outils pour l’accompagnement individuel à la création d’activités en agriculture : quelles caractéristiques et fonctions attendues ?

Dalmais, Mathieu; Gasselin, Pierre; Cerf, Marianne

doi:10.3917/pour.227.0022

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

(4 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In southern France, this accompaniment approach, co-built by researchers and associations supporting the setting up in agriculture of persons from outside the world of agriculture (Association for the development of agricultural and rural employment of Languedoc-Roussillon, Airdie[32]), relies on three reflexive tools, whose flexibility is guaranteed because of the possibility of instrumentation that is inherent to them (Dalmais et al, 2015).…”

Section: Principles Of and Tools For The Accompaniment Of Multi-activmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation and development in agricultural and food systems

Faure¹,

Chiffoleau²,

Goulet³

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Much more than a fashionable notion or buzzword, innovation has become a key issue for companies, policies and, more generally, society. In the Global North as in the Global South, innovating, i.e. introducing a novelty in an economic and social environment, appears more than ever as a factor of competitiveness for enterprises, leading to cost reductions, improved productivity or product quality, or the creation of new markets in a context of globalized competition (Porter and Heppelmann, 2014). In an extension of Schumpeter's (1934) work, innovation is more widely reaffirmed as a source of macroeconomic growth, at the heart now of a 'knowledge economy', deriving value from creativity, learning and communication (Foray, 2004; Stiglitz and Greenwald, 2014). It is also put forward as a solution to the problems generated by economic development itself, especially in the ecological, energy and food fields, leading to what Callon et al. (2015) call a regime of the economy of techno-scientific promises. Finally, across frontiers opened up by new technologies, in the digital and biotechnology fields for example, innovation is envisaged as the possible catalyst of a more radical social transformation, moving the world towards increased knowledge sharing (Rifkin, 2011), transhumanism (Ferry, 2016) and a break with the current forms of capitalism (Latouche, 2006). Of course, critical points of view question this craze for innovation (Godin and Vinck, 2017; Petit, 2015). Both creative and destructive, innovation can lead to social exclusion, destroy jobs and businesses, result in monopolies and misappropriations, and generate new technical and societal risks that need to be understood and addressed (Joly et al., 2015; Temple et al., 2018). But these critics often end up relying on the notion of innovation itself to suggest, or sometimes rehabilitate, alternative paths or avenues of resistance, for example through innovations qualified as 'social' or 'frugal'. Whether in the scientific, political, industrial arenas, or more broadly those of entrepreneurship and the media, innovation appears as a notion that is open to analysis, encouragement and criticism regarding societal changes. But it is also capable of underpinning the transformations of our contemporary societies. This primacy of innovation seems to have won over every corner of society, attracting attention, debate and engagement in all its economic sectors. It is in this context that this book presents contemporary perspectives on innovation in one of these sectors: agriculture and food. Several books and collection of studies have helped shed light on the issue of innovation in agriculture from different disciplinary and geographical perspectives (

show abstract

Section: Principles Of and Tools For The Accompaniment Of Multi-activmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation and development in agricultural and food systems

Faure¹,

Chiffoleau²,

Goulet³

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dans le Sud de la France, cette démarche d'accompagnement, co-construite par des chercheurs et des associations d'accompagnement à l'installation en agriculture (Association pour le développement de l'emploi agricole et rural du Languedoc-Roussillon, Airdie 1 ), s'appuie sur trois outils réflexifs, dont la souplesse est garantie par la possibilité d'instrumentation qui leur est inhérente (Dalmais et al, 2015). Un premier outil interroge les motivations et les compétences de la personne, un autre l'ancrage territorial du projet, et un troisième la durabilité du système d'activité projeté.…”

Section: Principes Et Outils De L'accompagnement Des Pluriactifs En Funclassified