1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.471933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concerning the applicability of density functional methods to atomic and molecular negative ions

Abstract: There is concern within theoretical chemistry that density functional methods are fundamentally in error for negative ions. We have tested this hypothesis by evaluating electron affinities for F and F2 with a variety of density functionals and extremely large, diffuse basis sets. In addition, we have observed the behavior of a known unbound system Ne−. We have found no convincing evidence to support the claims of negative ion instability with density functional methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
152
2
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
152
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…30,50 For the atomic systems, the MAD are 0.130 eV ͑PBE͒, 0.071 ͑revPBE͒, 0.119 ͑B86PBE͒, and 0.081 ͑xPBE͒. All four functionals perform significantly better for the second low atoms.…”
Section: Ionization Potentials Electron Affinities and Proton Afmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30,50 For the atomic systems, the MAD are 0.130 eV ͑PBE͒, 0.071 ͑revPBE͒, 0.119 ͑B86PBE͒, and 0.081 ͑xPBE͒. All four functionals perform significantly better for the second low atoms.…”
Section: Ionization Potentials Electron Affinities and Proton Afmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47][48][49][50] On one hand, the ''self-interaction error'' causes the Kohn-Sham orbital energies to be shifted upwards artificially, leading to positive ͑unstable͒ orbital energies for the highest occupied orbitals of an anion. On the other hand, an artificial stabilization is provided by employing a finite basis sets with functions localized at the anion.…”
Section: Ionization Potentials Electron Affinities and Proton Afmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, for the atoms and very small molecules studied here, it is well-known [110][111][112] that with common semi-local approximations negative ions of small systems may erroneously be predicted to be unstable. However, when performing calculations with finite basis sets, as in, e.g., [113], unbound states can be artificially stabilized [114], because the basis set effectively confines the unbound electron to the vicinity of the neutral system. Because the ensemble generalization discussed here does not change the total energies of systems with integer electrons (including neutrals, cations, and anions), anions that are not bound with the underlying xc functional will remain unbound even if its ensemble-generalized version is employed.…”
Section: B Evaluating the Test Set -A Systematic Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ÅÀ were optimized at the B3LYP/ DZP++ level of theory [14][15][16][17] using GAMESS-UK [21]. As noted previously in the linear acene series [14], application of the DZP++ basis set has one major drawback.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, experimental AEAs of CP-PAHs are not available [8]. Therefore, we were prompted to compute AEAs of a representative series of (CP)-PAHs at the ab initio B3LYP/DZP++ level of theory [14][15][16][17]. We here report and discuss the gas phase AEAs with and without zero-point vibrational energy (ZPVE) [9,10] and the bowl-shaped corannulene (9) [19,20] (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%