2001
DOI: 10.1527/tjsai.16.436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptural Analysis and Description of Words for Color and Lightness for Grounding them on Sensory Data.

Abstract: SummaryDevelopment of intelligent robots and rapid increase of aged societies have brought serious necessity of such systems that should facilitate mutual translation of sensory data and linguistic expressions. They are expected to help people, especially with some defected sense-organ, by translating sensory data into words such as "Pungent smell is sensed in the refrigerator!", and otherwise enable people to order a robot to work by words such as "Search the room for a varicolored object."For the purpose to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More analytically, these omnisensory images are associated with spatiotemporal changes (or constancies) in certain attributes of the matters scanned by FAO and modeled as temporally parameterized "loci in attribute spaces", so www.intechopen.com Towards Artificial Communication Partners with a Multiagent Mind Model Based on Mental Image Directed Semantic Theory 335 called, to be formulated in the formal language L md . This language has already been implemented on several types of computerized intelligent systems including IMAGES-M (e.g., Yokota et al, 1984;Oda, et al, 2001;Amano, et al, 2005;Yokota & Capi, 2005a). The most remarkable feature of L md is its capability of formalizing spatiotemporal matter concepts grounded in human/robotic sensation while the other similar KRLs are designed to describe the logical relations among conceptual primitives represented by lexical tokens (e.g., Dorr & Bonnie, 1997;Zarri, 1997;Sowa, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More analytically, these omnisensory images are associated with spatiotemporal changes (or constancies) in certain attributes of the matters scanned by FAO and modeled as temporally parameterized "loci in attribute spaces", so www.intechopen.com Towards Artificial Communication Partners with a Multiagent Mind Model Based on Mental Image Directed Semantic Theory 335 called, to be formulated in the formal language L md . This language has already been implemented on several types of computerized intelligent systems including IMAGES-M (e.g., Yokota et al, 1984;Oda, et al, 2001;Amano, et al, 2005;Yokota & Capi, 2005a). The most remarkable feature of L md is its capability of formalizing spatiotemporal matter concepts grounded in human/robotic sensation while the other similar KRLs are designed to describe the logical relations among conceptual primitives represented by lexical tokens (e.g., Dorr & Bonnie, 1997;Zarri, 1997;Sowa, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is very simple but the locus formula representation as MPR can work fairly well, which has been partly proven by the successful results of several versions of the intelligent system IMAGES [3], [6], [7], [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CMM is one kind of the multi-agent models [2]. Its most distinctively remarkable point is that it works by computing mental phenomena representations so called 'Locus formulas' based on the Mental Image Directed Semantic Theory (MIDST) [3], whose validity has been proven by the successful results of several versions of the intelligent system IMAGES [3], [6], [7], [9]. The MIDST has been proposed in the scope of humans but it is general enough for such a common framework.…”
Section: Fig2 Presumable Cognitive Divide Between Humans and Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first, we formalize a piece of communication (C) as a set of messages (m's) in the expression (9). The authors have found that there are almost unique correspondences between the kinds of tasks (T's) and the types of sentences as shown in Table 1, which are very useful for computation.…”
Section: Formalization Of Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%