2011
DOI: 10.4314/sajpem.v30i2.67779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptually situating the harm of rape: an analysis of Objectification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, most critical to the extension of scientific knowledge in our work was the level of control we used in attempting to test the correlational role of dehumanization and objectification as robustly as possible in Study 1, which was then extended via a data-driven experimental test of causation in Study 2. By including mechanistic and animalistic dehumanization in empirical work on male proclivity toward sexual aggression, we lend support to intuitive and theoretical links between these factors MacKinnon 1985, 1988;Kelland 2011) and point to directions for future research and applications for this pressing worldwide problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, most critical to the extension of scientific knowledge in our work was the level of control we used in attempting to test the correlational role of dehumanization and objectification as robustly as possible in Study 1, which was then extended via a data-driven experimental test of causation in Study 2. By including mechanistic and animalistic dehumanization in empirical work on male proclivity toward sexual aggression, we lend support to intuitive and theoretical links between these factors MacKinnon 1985, 1988;Kelland 2011) and point to directions for future research and applications for this pressing worldwide problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…People are also less likely to help an objectified woman who is the victim of intimate partner violence (Pacilli et al 2017), which although not sexual in nature, is similarly often committed by men against women (Tjaden and Thoennes 2000). Furthermore, objectification has been theoretically linked to the perpetration of sexual aggression in particular MacKinnon 1985, 1988;Kelland 2011), and indeed, there is some empirical research into the potential relationship between objectification and sexual aggression. In one study where a fictitious woman reported being the victim of rape, higher levels of victim dehumanization and objectification (in the form of sexualization) increased victim-blame and reduced some elements of perceived suffering (Loughnan et al 2013).…”
Section: Dehumanization Objectification and Sexual Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results demonstrated that our sample of African American women experienced a number of traumatic events where they were sexually objectified, which undoubtedly contributed to concerns about physical safety. Kelland (2011, p. 168) shared that SOEs carry an implicit threat of rape, and this implicit threat permeates the “lived experience of being a woman under patriarchy because of the prevalence, leaning and place of sexual objectification in hegemonic patriarchal ideology.” Being an African American woman, however, adds other dimensions of discrimination, and given a history of violence and oppression, concerns about physical safety may be particularly salient for African American women. This aspect of OT has scarcely been examined and deserves further exploration within future research examining African American women’s SOEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Du Toit 2009) Finally, I have argued, in other work, that rape makes good on the threat of sexual objectification by treating women as inert and object-like rather than as agents in the world. (Kelland 2011) If it is the case that the subjectivity, agency, and personhood of the victim is attacked during rape, then Brison is indeed correct to argue that one of the most important obstacles to recovery is 'regaining one's voice, one's subjectivity, after one has been reduced to silence, to the status of an object, or, worse, made into someone else's speech, an instrument of another's agency.' (Brison 2002: 55) For Brison this is achieved by regaining control through the construction, and telling, of a narrative of one's experience.…”
Section: Supplementing a Narrative Model Of Recoverymentioning
confidence: 97%