Conceptualizing Youth BPD Within an MMPI-A Framework

Sellbom, Martin; Jarrett, Matthew A.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0591-1_6

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 60 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, disconstraint, represented as DISC, describes symptoms along with the behavioral dysregulation and impulsivity of BPD [ 21 , 22 ]. The results of this study are in line with the existing literature indicating that eight out of nine symptoms of DSM-5 BPD criteria are related to NEGE and DISC [ 23 ].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Similarly, a significant correlation was found between PSYC and BOR-total in the correlation analysis; however, in the regression analysis and path analysis where all PSY-5 scales were presented, PSYC was not found to be a significant predictor of the BOR-total and subscale scores. This is because NEGE and DISC explain BPD symptoms accurately [ 23 ]. Although PSYC is related to the stress-induced paranoia and dissociative experiences of BPD [ 24 ], PSYC typically explains bizarre and disorganized features such as disconnection from reality, including unshared beliefs and unusual perceptual experiences [ 25 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Dimensional Understanding of Borderline Personality Disorder Using MMPI-2 PSY-5 Scales in Clinical Samples

Jin

Lee

Hwang

et al. 2021

Psychiatry Investig

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ders, fifth edition (DSM-5). 1 However, the traditional BPD diagnosis showed many limitations including inadequate coverage of personality psychopathology variance, excessive comorbidity, within-disorder heterogeneity, loss of sub-threshold information, and diagnostic instability. 2,3 To solve these issues, DSM-5 proposed an alternative model of personality disorder (AMPD) with dimensional domains. 1 This domain-level trait model is based on dimensional models of personality such as the Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5), which includes antagonism, disinhibition, negative affectivity, detachment, and psychoticism as five domains. 4 At the measurement level, PSY-5 scales were developed onto the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) item pool to evaluate the PSY-5 domains. 4 The MMPI-2 PSY-5 scales are aggressiveness (AGGR), disconstraint (DISC), negative emotionality/neuroticism (NEGE), introversion/low posi-

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Dimensional Understanding of Borderline Personality Disorder Using MMPI-2 PSY-5 Scales in Clinical Samples

Jin

Lee

Hwang

et al. 2021

Psychiatry Investig

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A number of excellent examples of this approach exist, and certainly, these measures have allowed much quicker progress in our understanding of adolescent PD than sole reliance on developmentally bottom‐up PD measures (i.e., measures that were empirically derived based on child and adolescent data) would have allowed. The most prominent examples of this include the adolescent version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI‐A; Butcher & Pope, ; Sellbom & Jarrett, ), the youth version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP‐Y; Linde, Stringer, Simms, & Clark, ), and the adolescent version of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology (DAPP‐BQ‐A; Tromp & Koot, ). These measures were largely based on their adult counterparts, although in all cases modifications were made based on developmental considerations, including readability of items and the developmental appropriateness of various behaviors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relevance of informant discrepancies for the assessment of adolescent personality pathology.

Tackett¹,

Herzhoff²,

Reardon³

et al. 2013

Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we compare the nature and function of selfparent informant discrepancies for adolescent personality pathology using two methods: standard difference scores (SDS) and polynomial regressions. In total, 489 11-to 18year-old youth (54% female) and their parents reported on youth personality pathology traits and general psychopathology. Findings supported convergence and divergence in parent-and self-reports. Potential utility of informant discrepancies also emerged, such that discrepancies on trait disagreeableness and trait compulsivity predicted youth externalizing problems using the SDS approach and the polynomial regression approach; however, the polynomial regression approach yielded a more complex and nuanced characterization of informant discrepancies than did the SDS approach. Taken together, these results suggest that polynomial regressions may provide a more comprehensive picture regarding the meaning and utility of informant discrepancies.

show abstract

Conceptualizing Youth BPD Within an MMPI-A Framework

Cited by 2 publications

References 60 publications

A Dimensional Understanding of Borderline Personality Disorder Using MMPI-2 PSY-5 Scales in Clinical Samples

A Dimensional Understanding of Borderline Personality Disorder Using MMPI-2 PSY-5 Scales in Clinical Samples

The relevance of informant discrepancies for the assessment of adolescent personality pathology.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About