Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions

Abstract

A B S T R A C TThe circular economy concept has gained momentum both among scholars and practitioners. However, critics claim that it means many different things to different people. This paper provides further evidence for these critics. The aim of this paper is to create transparency regarding the current understandings of the circular economy concept. For this purpose, we have gathered 114 circular economy definitions which were coded on 17 dimensions. Our findings indicate that the circular economy is most frequently depicted as a combination of reduce, reuse and recycle activities, whereas it is oftentimes not highlighted that CE necessitates a systemic shift. We further find that the definitions show few explicit linkages of the circular economy concept to sustainable development. The main aim of the circular economy is considered to be economic prosperity, followed by environmental quality; its impact on social equity and future generations is barely mentioned. Furthermore, neither business models nor consumers are frequently outlined as enablers of the circular economy. We critically discuss the various circular economy conceptualizations throughout this paper. Overall, we hope to contribute via this study towards the coherence of the circular economy concept; we presume that significantly varying circular economy definitions may eventually result in the collapse of the concept.

Key elements in assessing circular economy implementation in small and medium‐sized enterprises

“…A variety of definitions of CE have been suggested during the last decade (Geng & Doberstein, ; Haas, Krausmann, Wiedenhofer, & Heinz, ; Kirchherr, Reike, & Hekkert, ; Lieder & Rashid, ). In this paper, the circular economy is understood as “an economic system that represents a change of paradigm in the way that human society is interrelated with nature and aims to prevent the depletion of resources, close energy and materials loops, and facilitate sustainable development through its implementation at the micro (enterprises and consumers), meso (economic agents integrated in symbiosis) and macro (city, regions and governments) levels.…”

Sustainability reporting, materiality, and accountability assessment in the airport industry

“…Since 1998 and Elkington's statement, known as the “triple bottom line” concept, new conceptual entities have been suggested both describing and evolving sustainable development holistically. Indicatively, the concepts of “circular economy” (Geissdoerfer, Savaget, Bocken, & Hultink, ; Ghisellini, Cialani, & Ulgiati, ; Kirchherr, Reike, & Hekkert, ), “industrial symbiosis” (Baldassarre et al, ; Boons, Spekkink, & Mouzakitis, ; Chertow, ; Lombardi & Laybourn ), “Circles of Sustainability and the Fourth Dimension” (Hobson, ; Hopwood, Mellor, & O'Brien, ; Maydl, ; Robinson, ), and the “seven modalities” model (Murphy & McDonagh, ) have dynamically entered the academic and business world.…”

Consumer engagement in the circular economy: Exploring clothes swapping in emerging economies from a social practice perspective

“…Despite the interest shown by companies and governments in the idea of the circular economy, a system in which products, components, and materials are used multiple times through reuse, remanufacturing, and recycling before being disposed (Kirchherr, Reike, & Hekkert, ), consumers seem to be less enthusiastic when adopting the offerings embedded in such business models (Kirchherr et al, ; Rizos et al, ). Nevertheless, research on this issue is still scarce, and most existing contributions have concentrated on understanding the consumer's intention, or lack thereof, to engage with circular business models (Camacho‐Otero, Boks, & Pettersen, ).…”