2000
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5914.00119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizing Religion and Spirituality: Points of Commonality, Points of Departure

Abstract: Psychologists' emerging interest in spirituality and religion as well as the relevance of each phenomenon to issues of psychological importance requires an understanding of the fundamental characteristics of each construct. On the basis of both historical considerations and a limited but growing empirical literature, we caution against viewing spirituality and religiousness as incompatible and suggest that the common tendency to polarize the terms simply as individual vs. institutional or ′good′ vs. ′bad′ is n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
911
1
54

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,192 publications
(981 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
14
911
1
54
Order By: Relevance
“…In a multi-author article (Hill et al 2000), "Conceptualizing Religion and Spirituality," in which also Pargament and Hood are among the co-authors, we find further assertions that religion and spirituality are the same. The authors define both spirituality and religion in exactly the same words, namely as "the feelings, thoughts, experiences, and behaviors that arise from a search for the sacred" (Hill et al 2000, 66).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In a multi-author article (Hill et al 2000), "Conceptualizing Religion and Spirituality," in which also Pargament and Hood are among the co-authors, we find further assertions that religion and spirituality are the same. The authors define both spirituality and religion in exactly the same words, namely as "the feelings, thoughts, experiences, and behaviors that arise from a search for the sacred" (Hill et al 2000, 66).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Many people equate religion with spirituality, or use the words inter-changeably (Gorsuch and Walker, 2006), while others believe that equating spirituality and religion or using them inter-changeably is not valid (Scott, 2006). Hill et al (2000) argue that spirituality is subsumed by religion, but some see religion as only one dimension of spirituality (Estanek, 2006). Tanyi (2002) agrees that spirituality is the search for meaning, adhering to religion and balancing energy or basic trust.…”
Section: Spirituality and Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research proposes that all spiritual experiences cannot be considered equal with this premise based on varying depths of "consciousness" (Rosado, 2000). With researchers stating that spirituality develops across the individual"s lifespan (Hill et al, 2000), it remains to be seen whether an individual"s deeper stages of conceptual complexity translates into an experience of spirituality that is also more complex in nature (Reich, 2000).…”
Section: Challenges Defining Spiritualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some people these terms have the same meaning or are overlapping concepts, while for others they are vastly different (Anandarajah, 2008;Hill et al, 2000;Hill & Pargament, 2003;Hodge, Bonifas & Chou, 2010;Nelson, 2009). Therefore, simplistic distinctions should be avoided and definitions that focus on only one aspect of religion or spirituality may be inadequate (Nelson, 2009).…”
Section: Definitions Of Religiosity and Spiritualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes, for example, increased psychological well-being (Levin, Markides & Ray, 1996), lower suicide rates (Corrêa, Moreira-Almeida, Menezes et al, 2010), reduction in depressive symptomatology (Ellison, 1995), and stronger social support systems and coping strategies when dealing with stress and illness, including terminal illness (Averson, 2006;Beit-Hallahmi & Argyle, 1997;Corey, 2006;Corrêa, et al, 2010;Curlin, Lawrence, Odell et al, 2007;Hill, Pargament, Hood et al 2000;Koenig, 2004Koenig, , 2009Mueller et al, 2001;Nelson, 2009). Although this may be true for most of the population, it may not be the case for specific groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%