Conceptualizing pathways to sustainable agricultural intensification

Abstract

There is widespread consensus among scientists, policy makers, and practitioners that agriculture should become more sustainable, while maintaining the ability to meet future food demand. However, there are still many diverging views on what sustainable intensification means, and how to get there. In this article, we present a conceptual framework to navigate agricultural intensification pathways. The conceptual framework aligns three research themes central to improving the sustainability of agriculture: 1) What are the social, economic, and environmental trade-offs of alternative agricultural intensification options? 2) How do land managers decide on intensification strategies, and how can the adoption of sustainable practices be made more attractive? 3) How do socio-political, technological, and environmental mega-trends and other drivers of change affect sustainable intensification measures and agricultural landscapes? The framework presented here goes beyond earlier frameworks by considering multiple dimensions of intensity and sustainability, drawing from both natural and social science theories. Also, it operates across spatial and temporal scales, and is outcome-focused while explicitly considering the linkages between decision making processes and sustainability outcomes. We argue that given these novelties the conceptual framework can serve as a blueprint to assess pathways towards sustainable agricultural intensification.

Grain Legume Yield Responses to Rhizobia Inoculants and Phosphorus Supplementation Under Ghana Soils: A Meta-Synthesis

“…Raising crop yield to meet food demand and simultaneously increasing the profitability for farmers remain a challenge in the low-input farming systems of Africa (Tian and Yu, 2019 ). Agricultural technologies focusing on productivity increase, system durability, and improved farmer profitability are needed to enhance the household food security of smallholders (Helfenstein et al, 2020 ). Grain legume crops, such as soybean, cowpea, and groundnut, are an integral component in many cropping systems due to their capability to biologically fix atmospheric N 2 and convert it into usable forms of N for the benefit of agricultural systems.…”

An approach for comparing agricultural development to societal visions

“…We analyzed agricultural development both at the farm and the landscape scale as well as changes in social, economic, and environmental dimensions of sustainability (Helfenstein et al 2020 ). Farm-scale development was measured with indicators on farm area, livestock units, crop diversity, livestock diversity, and feed import (Table 1 ).…”

“…These inherent but often not explicitly declared values have been shown to bias individual sustainability assessment tools (Svarstad et al 2008 ; Binder et al 2010 ; Chopin et al 2021 ), challenging the legitimacy of sustainability research (van der Hel 2018 ). Such biases are especially relevant when assessing complex agricultural systems, which require accounting for multiple objectives playing out across a variety of spatial and temporal scales (Helfenstein et al 2020 ). While calls are growing louder to acknowledge that stakeholders have conflicting interests, norms, expectations, and visions in sustainability assessments (Miller et al 2014 ; Pascual et al 2017 ; Schlaile et al 2017 ; Chopin et al 2021 ), a systematic approach that reconciles different value attributions and weightings of sustainability assessment categories is missing.…”

Farmer surveys in Europe suggest that specialized, intensive farms were more likely to perceive negative impacts from COVID-19

“…We defined a broad set of indicators in order to compare farms from very heterogeneous agricultural systems (Helfenstein et al 2020 ). Share of main product, off-farm income, farming system, farm area, age, business type, and farm type were directly assessed through the questionnaire (Table 2 ).…”