2009
DOI: 10.1080/16184740903331937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizing a Meaningful Definition of Hazing in Sport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1998 -1999, a national survey of intercollegiate varsity athletes found that 79 % experienced some form of hazing (1) . However, in the decade since 2000, more published research has emerged with a range of foci including: attitudes toward hazing (11,16,17) , theories about why hazing persists (12,18,19) , and studies about the nature and extent of hazing (11,20,21) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In 1998 -1999, a national survey of intercollegiate varsity athletes found that 79 % experienced some form of hazing (1) . However, in the decade since 2000, more published research has emerged with a range of foci including: attitudes toward hazing (11,16,17) , theories about why hazing persists (12,18,19) , and studies about the nature and extent of hazing (11,20,21) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Saskatchewan, Canada, eleven senior high school athletes were charged in a hazing event that involved hitting younger Grade 9 and 10 team members with hickey sticks [ 44 ]. Hazing is defi ned as: Any potentially humiliating, degrading, abusive, or dangerous activity expected of a junior ranking athlete by a more senior teammate, which does not contribute to either athlete's positive development, but is required to be accepted as part of the team ( [ 45 ], p.449).…”
Section: Hazingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many team members may consider this to be a harmless, appropriate, and justifiable initiation activity. One possible explanation for this is that many student and young athletes are unable to define hazing (Allen & Madden, 2008;Crow & MacIntosh, 2009). Allen and Madden (2008), in one of the largest studies conducted into initiations and hazing in the USA with student-athletes, reported that there was confusion and a lack of knowledge about what constituted inappropriate initiation activities and hazing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These hypothetical benefits include demonstrating allegiance and dedication to the team and transitioning from new to accepted in-group member (Crow & MacIntosh, 2009;Kirby & Wintrup, 2002;Waldron, Lynn, & Krane, 2011). Waldron et al (2011) also suggested that a common explanation for engaging in initiation rituals is the misguided belief that they enhance the dynamics and subsequent cohesion of the team.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation