2015
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00190.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualizations of Giftedness and the Development of Talent: Implications for Counselors

Abstract: The authors present a historical perspective on giftedness, highlighting the impact of key research studies on practice, research, and policy. A comprehensive model is presented emphasizing that giftedness is domain specific and developmental and involves the cultivation of psychosocial as well as cognitive skills. Implications for counselors are discussed, specifically which psychosocial issues and skills should be the focus of counseling at each stage of talent development and what counselors can do to suppo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Once a student is identified, parents must decide what information they wish to disclose to their child. The benefits and perils of various labels, including being identified as gifted and talented, have been discussed at length in the literature (e.g., Berlin, ; Brogan & Knussen, ; Colangelo & Brower, ; Gates, ; Jastrowski, Berlin, Sato, & Davies, ; Schiltz, Schonfeld, & Niendam, ), and movement is being made toward a talent development model (see Olszewski‐Kubilius, Subotnik, & Worrell, ) instead of thinking of giftedness as a static condition (Subotnik, Olszewski‐Kubilius, & Worrell, ). Therefore, determining what to disclose can be a difficult decision for parents, given the different connotations for the labels.…”
Section: Identification Of Twice‐exceptionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a student is identified, parents must decide what information they wish to disclose to their child. The benefits and perils of various labels, including being identified as gifted and talented, have been discussed at length in the literature (e.g., Berlin, ; Brogan & Knussen, ; Colangelo & Brower, ; Gates, ; Jastrowski, Berlin, Sato, & Davies, ; Schiltz, Schonfeld, & Niendam, ), and movement is being made toward a talent development model (see Olszewski‐Kubilius, Subotnik, & Worrell, ) instead of thinking of giftedness as a static condition (Subotnik, Olszewski‐Kubilius, & Worrell, ). Therefore, determining what to disclose can be a difficult decision for parents, given the different connotations for the labels.…”
Section: Identification Of Twice‐exceptionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the so-called non-cognitive competencies have also been recognized as constituent elements of the phenomenon (Olszewski-Kubilius, Subotnik, & Worrell, 2015). Therefore, it has been noticed that non-intellectual traits (motivation, persistence, empathy, perfectionism, ethical concerns, responsibility, curiosity, and sense of humor, among others) have been considered as important as the commonly measured cognitive traits for promotion and full development of Giftedness (Almeida, Fleith & Oliveira, 2013;G.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mentoring has an important responsibility in developing talent and enhancing professional and academic capability [34]. Mentoring partnerships engage in a broad spectrum of learning activities such academic and career development and/or personal coaching, academic project reviews, attending conferences or meetings together, sharing books, links and information, networking, field trips, and many others [28].…”
Section: The Power Of Mentoringmentioning
confidence: 99%