Conceptualization of PhysioFun game: A low-cost videogame for home-based stroke rehabilitation

Ribeiro, Tânia; Veloso, Ana Isabel; Costa, Rui

doi:10.1109/tishw.2016.7847787

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Limitations were also mentioned with respect to the hardware development category, including the need for enhanced calibration or upgraded components for better monitoring of accurate data. One study reported the need to improve a control strategy [ 139 ], while others mentioned general hardware issues [ 61 , 109 , 134 , 156 , 166 ]. In addition, some studies referred to the need for adjustments regarding the range of motion of the users [ 49 , 160 ] or the size of the hand [ 5 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, some studies have attempted to create their own tracking system using commercial sensors. In some cases [57,58,[78][79][80][106][107][108][109][110], sets of inertial measurement units (IMUs) were used as basic tracking sensors to measure the body's force, orientation, and angular rate. The sensors were placed on different parts of the upper limb or body to track the coordinates of the arm and, consequently, the arm movement.…”

Section: Commercial Sensorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Serious Gaming Technology in Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: Scoping Review

Koutsiana¹,

Ladakis²,

Fotopoulos³

et al. 2020

JMIR Serious Games

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Serious gaming has increasingly gained attention as a potential new component in clinical practice. Specifically, its use in the rehabilitation of motor dysfunctions has been intensively researched during the past three decades. Objective: The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate the current role of serious games in upper extremity rehabilitation, and to identify common methods and practice as well as technology patterns. This objective was approached via the exploration of published research efforts over time. Methods: The literature search, using the PubMed and Scopus databases, included articles published from 1999 to 2019. The eligibility criteria were (i) any form of game-based arm rehabilitation; (ii) published in a peer-reviewed journal or conference; (iii) introduce a game in an electronic format; (iv) published in English; and (v) not a review, meta-analysis, or conference abstract. The search strategy identified 169 relevant articles. Results: The results indicated an increasing research trend in the domain of serious gaming deployment in upper extremity rehabilitation. Furthermore, differences regarding the number of publications and the game approach were noted between studies that used commercial devices in their rehabilitation systems and those that proposed a custom-made robotic arm, glove, or other devices for the connection and interaction with the game platform. A particularly relevant observation concerns the evaluation of the introduced systems. Although one-third of the studies evaluated their implementations with patients, in most cases, there is the need for a larger number of participants and better testing of the rehabilitation scheme efficiency over time. Most of the studies that included some form of assessment for the introduced rehabilitation game mentioned user experience as one of the factors considered for evaluation of the system. Besides user experience assessment, the most common evaluation method involving patients was the use of standard medical tests. Finally, a few studies attempted to extract game features to introduce quantitative measurements for the evaluation of patient improvement. Conclusions: This paper presents an overview of a significant research topic and highlights the current state of the field. Despite extensive attempts for the development of gamified rehabilitation systems, there is no definite answer as to whether a serious game is a favorable means for upper extremity functionality improvement; however, this certainly constitutes a supplementary means for motivation. The development of a unified performance quantification framework and more extensive experiments could generate richer evidence and contribute toward this direction.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Commercial Sensorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Serious Gaming Technology in Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: Scoping Review

Koutsiana¹,

Ladakis²,

Fotopoulos³

et al. 2020

JMIR Serious Games

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Limitations were also mentioned with respect to the hardware development category, including the need for enhanced calibration or upgraded components for better monitoring of accurate data. One study reported the need to improve a control strategy [139], while others mentioned general hardware issues [61,109,134,156,166]. In addition, some studies referred to the need for adjustments regarding the range of motion of the users [49,160] or the size of the hand [5].…”

Section: Hardware Use Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Serious Gaming Technology in Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: Scoping Review (Preprint)

Koutsiana¹,

Ladakis²,

Fotopoulos³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Serious gaming is increasingly gaining attention as a potential new component in clinical practice. Specifically, its use in the rehabilitation of motor dysfunctions has been intensively researched during the past three decades. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aims to evaluate the current role of serious games in the upper extremity rehabilitation and identify common methods and practice, technology patterns as well as gaps. This objective is approached via the exploration of published research efforts over the years. METHODS The literature research, using the PubMed and Scopus databases, included articles published until June 2019. The eligibility criteria were (i) to include any form of introduced game-based arm rehabilitation, (ii) to be a study published in a peer-reviewed journal or conference, (iii) to introduce a game in an electronic format, (iv) to be a study in English, (v) to not be a review, meta-analysis, editorial or commentary. The review identified 169 relevant articles. RESULTS The results indicate an increasing research trend in the domain of serious gaming deployment in upper extremity rehabilitation. Furthermore, differences regarding the number of publications and the game approach were noted between studies which used commercial devices in their rehabilitation systems, with studies which created any type of robotic arm, glove or other devices for the connection with the game platform. A significant observation concerns the evaluation of the introduced systems. Although one-third of the studies evaluate in real use their implementations including patients, in most cases, there is the need for a bigger number of participants and better testing of the rehabilitation scheme efficiency over time. Most of the studies which included some form of assessment for the introduced rehabilitation game, mentioned among others the user experience as a factor for the system’s evaluation. Besides the user experience assessment, the most common evaluation method involving patients was the use of medical standard tests. Finally, a few studies attempted to extract game features in order to introduce quantitative measurements for the evaluation of the patient’s improvement. CONCLUSIONS This paper presents an overview of a significant research topic and highlights the current state of the field. Despite all the attempts for the development of a rehabilitation system, there is not a definite answer of whether a serious game is a favorable means for the upper extremity functionality improvement, but it is certainly constitutes a supplementary means for motivation. The development of a unified performance quantification framework and the conductance of wider scale experiments could generate richer evidence and contribute in this direction.

show abstract