Abstract:Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) frequently present co-morbidly with a range of somatic and psychiatric conditions. This review discusses the relationship between PNES, a number of co-morbid psychiatric symptoms, early attachment trauma, and disruption of neurological development. We suggest that it may be clinically useful to understand PNES with reference to three patterns of co-morbidity and trauma history. In the first group, PNES are one symptom of a response to severe, chronic trauma and invalid… Show more
“…It is also important to investigate the characteristics and the circumstances of the traumatic event in patients with PNES in order to determine the best type of psychotherapy [51]. Currently, there are no guidelines regarding treatment of PNES because the symptoms reflect a variety of different defense mechanisms which can give rise to the symptoms [12].…”
“…It is also important to investigate the characteristics and the circumstances of the traumatic event in patients with PNES in order to determine the best type of psychotherapy [51]. Currently, there are no guidelines regarding treatment of PNES because the symptoms reflect a variety of different defense mechanisms which can give rise to the symptoms [12].…”
“…PNES constitute a heterogeneous population with varying degrees of psychiatric background and somatic complaints. 22,23 It is unlikely that one single model can explain PNES for all subgroups of patients. Certain traits that describe cognitive and emotion processing styles have been identified in PNES.…”
Section: A Conceptualization Model For Pnesmentioning
Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) consist of paroxystic events facilitated by a dysfunction in emotion processing. Models explaining the pathogenic mechanisms leading to these seizure-like episodes are limited. In this article, evidence that supports dysfunction at the level of arousal tolerance, cognitive-emotional information processing and volitional control is reviewed. A hypothetical pathophysiological mechanism is discussed based on functional neuroimaging evidence from PNES-related conditions and traits. This pathophysiological model suggests an alteration in the influence and connection of brain areas involved in emotion processing onto other brain areas responsible for sensorimotor and cognitive processes. Integrating this information, PNES are conceptualized as brief episodes facilitated by an unstable cognitive-emotional attention system. During the episodes, sensorimotor and cognitive processes are modified or not properly integrated, allowing the deployment of autonomous prewired behavioral tendencies. Finally, I elaborate on how therapeutic applications could be modified based on the proposed hypothetical model, potentially improving clinical outcomes.
“…A previous study by our team 21 compared FDS patients according to trauma history and found that those who reported a history of trauma had significantly more psychiatric comorbidities and stronger dissociative tendencies. Likewise, Quinn et al 43 divided patients with FDS into three groups according to their trauma experience backgrounds and psychiatric comorbidities on the basis of a literature review. In their first group, the seizures appeared to be a response to severe and chronic trauma.…”
Objective: Current concepts highlight the neurological and psychological heterogeneity of functional/dissociative seizures (FDS). However, it remains uncertain whether it is possible to distinguish between a limited number of subtypes of FDS disorders. We aimed to identify profiles of distinct FDS subtypes by cluster analysis of a multidimensional dataset without any a priori hypothesis.
Methods:We conducted an exploratory, prospective multicenter study of 169 patients with FDS. We collected biographical, trauma (childhood and adulthood traumatic experiences), semiological (seizure characteristics), and psychopathological data (psychiatric comorbidities, dissociation, and alexithymia) through psychiatric interviews and standardized scales. Clusters were identified by the Partitioning Around Medoids method. The similarity of patients was computed using Gower distance. The clusters were compared using analysis of variance, chi-squared, or Fisher exact tests.Results: Three patient clusters were identified in this exploratory, hypothesisgenerating study and named on the basis of their most prominent characteristics: 1. A "No/Single Trauma" group (31.4%), with more male patients, intellectual disabilities, and nonhyperkinetic seizures, and a low level of psychopathology; 2. A "Cumulative Lifetime Traumas" group (42.6%), with clear female predominance, hyperkinetic seizures, relatively common comorbid epilepsy, and a high level of psychopathology; and 3. A "Childhood Traumas" group (26%), commonly with comorbid epilepsy, history of childhood sexual abuse (75%), and posttraumatic stress disorder, but also with a high level of anxiety and dissociation.Significance: Although our cluster analysis was undertaken without any a priori hypothesis, the nature of the trauma history emerged as the most important differentiator between three common FDS disorder subtypes. This subdifferentiation of FDS disorders may facilitate the development of more specific therapeutic programs for each patient profile.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.