Conceptualization and measurement of mental health providers' recovery-promoting competence: The Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale (RPRS).

Russinova, Zlatka; Rogers, E. Sally; Cook, Karon F.; Ellison, Marsha Langer; Lyass, Asya

doi:10.1037/h0094741

Cited by 27 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The priorities identified in this study are well aligned with recovery and with consumers’ priorities in similar studies (Russinova et al ., , ), and extend the findings of previous studies of mental health consumers’ priorities for curricula in other disciplines. These studies have tended to take a broader approach to mental health practice, rather than focusing on recovery‐oriented practice.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

“…Moreover, Williams and Tufford's study was limited to consumers with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, so has limited applicability with the broad range of consumers with whom occupational therapists might work. Russinova et al (2011Russinova et al ( , 2013 developed the Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale based on consumer and provider perspectives. This is a consumer-rated measure of practitioner competence for recovery-oriented practice.…”

Section: Recovery Competencies and Capabilitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A recovery‐orientation requires an emphasis on consumers’ lived experience expertise as valid evidence to inform practice alongside professional knowledge, so competencies for recovery‐oriented mental health practice should also be informed by lived experience. Three projects have adopted this approach (Lakeman, ; Russinova, Rogers, Cook, Ellison & Lyass, ; Russinova, Rogers, Ellison & Lyass, ; Williams & Tufford, ). Lakeman utilised a Delphi method in which consumers ranked a list of statements drawn from literature and agreed a set of recovery competency statements.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Russinova et al . (, ) developed the Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale based on consumer and provider perspectives. This is a consumer‐rated measure of practitioner competence for recovery‐oriented practice.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Learning from consumers: An eDelphi study of Australian mental health consumers’ priorities for recovery‐oriented curricula

Arblaster

Mackenzie

Matthews

et al. 2018

Aus Occup Therapy J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

These findings highlight important capabilities from consumers' perspectives, suggesting key content for curricula. Active roles in designing, delivering and evaluating curricula were preferred, providing some guidance for educators seeking to involve consumers. Further research is required to refine these priorities, and to evaluate acceptability, feasibility and efficacy of varying modes of consumer involvement.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: Recovery Competencies and Capabilitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Learning from consumers: An eDelphi study of Australian mental health consumers’ priorities for recovery‐oriented curricula

Arblaster

Mackenzie

Matthews

et al. 2018

Aus Occup Therapy J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Criterion validity was moderately established against the Hope Scale, the WAI, and the RAS. A similar estimate of the correlation between the original RPRS and the WAI, demonstrated that the RPRS-Heb and the WAI also tap comparable but not overlapping constructs (Russinova et al, 2013). In a similar manner the Hope Scale demonstrated a somewhat lower correlation although still significant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Hebrew version of the Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale (RPRS).

Moran¹,

Zisman‐Ilani²,

Garber-Epstein³

et al. 2014

Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recovery is supported by relationships that are characterized by human centeredness, empowerment and a hopeful approach. The Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale (RPRS; Russinova, Rogers, & Ellison, 2006) assesses consumer-provider relationships from the consumer perspective. Here we present the adaptation and psychometric assessment of a Hebrew version of the RPRS. The RPRS was translated to Hebrew (RPRS-Heb) using multiple strategies to assure conceptual soundness. Then 216 mental health consumers were administered the RPRS-Heb as part of a larger project initiative implementing illness management and recovery intervention (IMR) in community settings. Psychometric testing included assessment of the factor structure, reliability, and validity using the Hope Scale, the Working Alliance Inventory, and the Recovery Assessment Scale. The RPRS-Heb factor structure replicated the two factor structures found in the original scale with minor exceptions. Reliability estimates were good: Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.94. An estimate of 0.93 for the Recovery-Promoting Strategies factor, and 0.86 for the Core Relationship. Concurrent validity was confirmed using the Working Alliance Scale (rp = .51, p < .001) and the Hope Scale (rp = .43, p < .001). Criterion validity was examined using the Recovery Assessment Scale (rp = .355, p < .05). The study yielded a 23-item RPRS-Heb version with a psychometrically sound factor structure, satisfactory reliability, and concurrent validity tested against the Hope, Alliance, and Recovery Assessment scales. Outcomes are discussed in the context of the original scale properties and a similar Dutch initiative. The RPRS-Heb can serve as a valuable tool for studying recovery promoting relationships with Hebrew speaking population.

show abstract

Individual Peer Support: A Qualitative Study of Mechanisms of Its Effectiveness

Gidugu

Rogers

Harrington

et al. 2014

Community Ment Health J

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peer-delivered services for individuals with psychiatric conditions have proliferated over the past three decades. The values and principles underlying peer support have been explored, but we lack an understanding of its mechanisms of action. To shed light on the processes of peer support, we conducted a study with individuals who had received substantial individual peer support. We completed individual interviews, audiotaped, transcribed, and examined them using a thematic analysis approach. Our analyses suggest that individual peer support provided various practical, emotional, and social supports which were perceived as beneficial. Participants valued having someone to rely on, a friend, and someone to socialize with. We, however, found that individuals' expectations of peer support did not always comport with available services. Participants viewed peer support as especially valuable because of the opportunity for a non-treatment based, normalizing relationship. We conclude that peer support complements rather than supplants needed traditional mental health services.

show abstract

Conceptualization and measurement of mental health providers' recovery-promoting competence: The Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale (RPRS).

Abstract: This scale is a tool for assessing mental health and rehabilitation practitioners' competencies from the perspective of the individual served which can be used both in research and program evaluation of agencies serving individuals with psychiatric disabilities.

Cited by 27 publications

References 40 publications

Learning from consumers: An eDelphi study of Australian mental health consumers’ priorities for recovery‐oriented curricula

Learning from consumers: An eDelphi study of Australian mental health consumers’ priorities for recovery‐oriented curricula

Adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Hebrew version of the Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale (RPRS).

Individual Peer Support: A Qualitative Study of Mechanisms of Its Effectiveness

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About