2015
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2015.1076825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualising the geographic world: the dimensions of negotiation in crowdsourced cartography

Abstract: In crowdsourced cartographic projects, mappers coordinate their e↵orts through online tools to produce digital geospatial artefacts, such as maps and gazetteers, which were once the exclusive territory of professional surveyors and cartographers. In order to produce meaningful and coherent data, contributors need to negotiate a shared conceptualisation that defines the domain concepts, such as road, building, train station, forest, and lake, enabling the communication of geographic knowledge. Considering the O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of VGI to be collected and maintained by a community implies that the advancement of the dataset and its underlaying folksonomy, that is, the semantics of the tags used in OSM, are not controlled by a single person or authority but rather the result of a community-driven process [8][9][10]. The tools and services used to produce and process the data are neither.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of VGI to be collected and maintained by a community implies that the advancement of the dataset and its underlaying folksonomy, that is, the semantics of the tags used in OSM, are not controlled by a single person or authority but rather the result of a community-driven process [8][9][10]. The tools and services used to produce and process the data are neither.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they have been generalised to describe inequalities in other fields, such as education [19] and Wikipedia contributions [20]. In recent literature, they are also used to analyse OSM Wiki editing activities [21]. In our context, assuming that contributors are sorted by their contributions ascendingly, we choose the cumulative share of contributors as X and the cumulative share of contributions as Y, and get a Lorenz curve for OSM contributions.…”
Section: Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the observable negotiation in OSM revolves around ontology engineering, i.e. the extraction of an explicit conceptualization from tacit knowledge, but in an informal, online setting (Ballatore & Mooney 2015). The dimensions of this negotiation can be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Vgi and Meaningmentioning
confidence: 99%