2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40319-014-0161-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptualising the European Union’s Competence in Copyright – What Can the EU Do?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of copyright problematics in both-western and Russian scientific literature-is being the prerogative of the legal fraternity. However, in the western literature along with common works, which reveal main principles for construction of system and functioning of copyright (Bently & Sherman, 2001;Blanco White & Jacob, 1986;Ramalho A, 2014;Peukert, 2011;Kunstadt, 2014), there are works illustrating separate aspects for realization of copyright for products of science (Pila, 2010). Thus, there are wide-spread discussions of matters linked to the specificity of requirements to the degree of work's originality that allows considering it as of authorship (Lavik & van Gompel, 2013;Gervais, 2002;Rahmatian, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of copyright problematics in both-western and Russian scientific literature-is being the prerogative of the legal fraternity. However, in the western literature along with common works, which reveal main principles for construction of system and functioning of copyright (Bently & Sherman, 2001;Blanco White & Jacob, 1986;Ramalho A, 2014;Peukert, 2011;Kunstadt, 2014), there are works illustrating separate aspects for realization of copyright for products of science (Pila, 2010). Thus, there are wide-spread discussions of matters linked to the specificity of requirements to the degree of work's originality that allows considering it as of authorship (Lavik & van Gompel, 2013;Gervais, 2002;Rahmatian, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%